They give the S/D per shot , or group of shots , and then the E/S number follows .
The statement that changing the seating depth is just changing the case volume is interesting. I think what you are saying is that you can create the same velocity curve in QL by changing either the case volume or the seating depth. I’ll take your word for it, makes sense to me. I’m not sure this translates to accuracy changes though, and I don’t think QL can predict those. I think there are multiple effects going on that impact the accuracy, and some of them are not controlled by internal ballistics, such as the compressional and shear waves in the rifle as per Chris Long.I have a Magnetospeed and love it. I do not mess with statistics on the unit as I take my data home and input Mv range in EXCEL and do a curve fit with ES and also get SD as I calculate them on my HP calculator.
I use that data to find the best load for lowest ES . This negates fiddling with seating depth as the curve fit function allows a very good curve that I use for lowest ES.
Folks don't realize, that fiddling with seating depth does the same function as my method. Adjusting seating depth is simply changing the case volume. I have experimented with QuuickLoad and found that tweaking load is just as accurate as changing seating depth. I test 6 5shot groups with ~1% steps and this gives the same change in Mv as changing seating depth in 0.005" increments.