Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yellow11 said:Ron, I think youi got that back to front.
Surely you ment to say jammed, as that will leave more space in the brass
I don’t think the tiny distance the bullet is jumping (likely maximum of 60-80 thousandths) is enough distance to create the kind of velocity to cause damage. The fire burning behind the bullet is what does the damage. That being said, personally I’ve found jamming bullets has a larger effect on throat erosion than jumping them (comparing throat erosion per 100 rounds fired).In my mind the jumped bullet would hit the lands with more velocity that would/could
cause more erosion but what do I know.
I don’t think the tiny distance the bullet is jumping (likely maximum of 60-80 thousandths) is enough distance to create the kind of velocity to cause damage. The fire burning behind the bullet is what does the damage. That being said, personally I’ve found jamming bullets has a larger effect on throat erosion than jumping them (comparing throat erosion per 100 rounds fired).
Dave
I have done this test. I had two 308 barrels for the same gun that shot the same load, and one I exclusively jumped bullets for and the other I exclusively jammed bullets with. I measure throat erosion every 2-300 rounds and the jammed bullets barrel wore the lands at a rate of over 25% more than the jumped bullets barrel. To be honest, I was somewhat shocked by these results.If you have done the actual comparison, then I respect that. Thanks for the info.
THANKSI have done this test. I had two 308 barrels for the same gun that shot the same load, and one I exclusively jumped bullets for and the other I exclusively jammed bullets with. I measure throat erosion every 2-300 rounds and the jammed bullets barrel wore the lands at a rate of over 25% more than the jumped bullets barrel. To be honest, I was somewhat shocked by these results.