• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Interesting Scope Testing Results

Kyle Schultz

Gold $$ Contributor
With competition season pretty much over, I pulled several of my scopes off their rifles to be tested for reticle jump. Today, I tested a Valdada 36X, a Nightforce 12-42X56 BR, and a Nightforce 15-55X52 Competition. I utilized one of the original Hood scope checkers. It's set up for dovetail mounts. The only dovetail rifle I have is a 30BR so it provided the jolt. I normally have the Valdada 36X mounted on the 30BR so it already has dovetail rings. I bought a dovetail to picatinny adaptor from Kelbly's to use for the other scope/ring combinations. Testing done at 100 yards.

Because the Valdada 36X is so light, I mounted it as the outboard scope and the heavier Nightforce (and eventually March) scopes mounted on the picatinny adaptor directly on the centerline of the rifle. Here's a picture of the NF Competition and Valdada 36X side-by-side. It's a tight fit.

IMG_7285.JPG

I started by testing the Valdada 36 against the NF Benchrest. I did this because I did not have a frozen scope to use as a reference and these 2 scopes have universal reputations as being very stable. The idea being if these 2 scopes tracked each other than I would use the Valdada as my reference scope going forward.

I fired a total of 3 shots; checking between shots. As hoped and expected, there was no discernable reticle difference between the two scopes. This also convinced me that my testing setup was sound. Next I substituted the NF Competition for the NF Benchrest and tested with the Valdada 36X now serving as the control scope.

After the first shot, the NF Competition reticle jumped vertically about 0.1". After the second shot, the reticle was 0.2" up and 0.1" right. After third shot, reticle was 0.25" up and 0.2" right. Fourth shot was unchanged from third. After the fifth and final shot, the NF reticle was 0.3" up and 0.2" right.

At this point, I decided to re-torque the cap screws and retest. Recommended torque values can be hard to find. I utilize rings from several suppliers; Nightforce, Seekins, Kelbly, and Badgar Ordnance. 15 in-lbs is a typical value but there is a wide range. Kelbly for instance is as low as 12 in-lbs while the NF Xtreme rings are as high as 25 in-lbs. As the rings in this test are the NF Xtreme, I re-torqued to just shy of 25 in-lbs.

I repeated the testing sequence after spinning the elevation and windage knobs several MOA back and forth and then zeroing up the NF Competition with the Valdada control scope. Upon firing, there now was NO discernable reticle shift observed for the NF Competition scope. Fired a total of 3 shots; checking after each shot for any movement.

I spun the knobs again and after zeroing up, ran a third test. Total of 3 shots. Again, I observed no discernable shift in the Nightforce Competition reticle.

So what's the moral of the story? Prior to the this testing, I was convinced the reticle was moving in my Nightforce Competition scope. I still believe there was movement but I now must conclude that perhaps the issue was with the scope rings and not with the scope itself.

I'm not going to presumptuously extrapolate my testing and resulting conclusions to anyone else's experience with their NF Competition scopes. I am going to be much more careful about rechecking the scope ring screws. I'm also going to consider using blue Loctite on the screws. I've read differing opinions about this practice and need to do more thinking before taking that step.

Hope this discussion has been of benefit to the community. Good luck!
 
Great info.

I called NF and asked them for torque specs on the U/L rings. They told me not to exceed 25 in lbs on the caps and not to exceed 68 in lbs on the cross bolts. Might be worth checking with them to see if the torque specs are the same on the steel rings.
 
So you changed two variables in a test at one time?
I would think that problems with ring torque would a sign of other problems. Something has the scope in a bind.
There are other post about the benefits of “exercising” a scope. Some call in “braking in”.
 
I appreciate this effort.

It also correlates to my experience with some rings: No matter how careful I think I was when I mounted them, it always pays to degrease them first, and check them regularly.
 
I was helping a friend today work up a load . He was sighted in at 600
So he shot low on the target at a dot .
For a reference to reverse his scope back . After we got a load he went back to reverse the process . 5 complete turns cross hairs only moved halfway . We loosen the rings and the cross hair moved . When he moved the horizontal adjustment the cross hairs moved again .
That tells me the rings and how they are tighten is a problem . Larry
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,277
Messages
2,214,927
Members
79,496
Latest member
Bie
Back
Top