The Swiss are finally undertaking a clean-up of the Mitholz disaster site and there has been some occasional chatter about the possibility that some of the GP11 (7.5x55) ammo buried there might eventually become available on the surplus market. The big issue is that the age of the ammo (at least 74 years and short shelf life of the non-corrosive but mercuric Berdan primers used in Swiss ammo between 1911 and the 1950s.
While I've never had an personal experience with mercuric primers, authors such as Hatcher are clear that firing mercuric primers will embrittle the brass case so that it can't be reloaded. Hatcher also states that mercuric primers deteriorate rapidly when stored in less-than-ideal conditions. One would imagine that GP11 ammo stored in a cave for over 70 years would be almost all duds.
I suppose that such ammo could be broken down, deprimed, cleaned, reprimed and reassembled but it would seem to be a very labor-intensive undertaking and only worthwhile if the ammo were almost free.
I'd like to know if anyone here has had any actual experience with mercuric primers? They were not commonly used in the US for several reasons discussed by Hatcher: 1) they ruined brass for reloading, 2) short shelf life and 3) didn't work well in Boxer primers. The US military stuck with a corrosive, potassium chlorate primer (except for the M1 carbine and some experiments) until the 1950s.
Does a single firing with a mercuric primer actually ruin a brass case or is it a cumulative effect over many firings? What would be the chances that, otherwise undamaged ammo, buried in a mountain in Switzerland would actually go "bang" 70+ years later? Would just the slow deterioration of the primer over the space of 70+ years damage the brass?
Assuming you shoot 7.5x55, what would you do if you were given a case of 70+ year-old GP11 ammo?
While I've never had an personal experience with mercuric primers, authors such as Hatcher are clear that firing mercuric primers will embrittle the brass case so that it can't be reloaded. Hatcher also states that mercuric primers deteriorate rapidly when stored in less-than-ideal conditions. One would imagine that GP11 ammo stored in a cave for over 70 years would be almost all duds.
I suppose that such ammo could be broken down, deprimed, cleaned, reprimed and reassembled but it would seem to be a very labor-intensive undertaking and only worthwhile if the ammo were almost free.
I'd like to know if anyone here has had any actual experience with mercuric primers? They were not commonly used in the US for several reasons discussed by Hatcher: 1) they ruined brass for reloading, 2) short shelf life and 3) didn't work well in Boxer primers. The US military stuck with a corrosive, potassium chlorate primer (except for the M1 carbine and some experiments) until the 1950s.
Does a single firing with a mercuric primer actually ruin a brass case or is it a cumulative effect over many firings? What would be the chances that, otherwise undamaged ammo, buried in a mountain in Switzerland would actually go "bang" 70+ years later? Would just the slow deterioration of the primer over the space of 70+ years damage the brass?
Assuming you shoot 7.5x55, what would you do if you were given a case of 70+ year-old GP11 ammo?