Using the Berger Twist Rate Calculator, I would not say that it predicts the 73 gr ELDM to be completely stable at an elevation of 360 ft and 70 degrees F. The following inputs were used:
View attachment 1438398
The following output was returned:
View attachment 1438399
An Sg of 1.19 is very marginal. For example, a few degrees colder and you might be looking at a situation where the bullet will begin putting oblong holes in the target, although probably not outright keyholing. Regardless, an Sg of 1.19 means giving up a substantial amount of the innate BC. It is important to note that the Berger twist rate calculator does not offer any input for a plastic tip.
Using the same bullet dimensions and weight at JBM Ballistics, and including a plastic tip length input of 0.150" yields the following [very different] output:
View attachment 1438401
However, if one removes the 0.150" plastic tip length, then the JBM output is pretty close to the Berger output:
View attachment 1438407
To be clear, I
think the outputs are the same (i.e. Sg) for the two different twist rate calculators, but am not 100% certain. JBM refers to their output as the Miller Stability Value.
The point here is that not all twist rate stability calculators yield the same results, even given the same basic inputs. Finally, although the outputs differ substantially if the plastic tip data is included/accounted for in the calculator, Bryan Litz has done actual stability and BC determinations for the Hornady 73 gr ELDM using radar data. His actual measurements for that bullet are not too different than the Berger Twist Rate Calculator and JBM Stability Calculator [
without the plastic tip input] outputs, the difference being that the actual measurements suggested ever so slightly more favorable stability (see "Nominal" and "Worst Case" outputs in the table at the bottom).
View attachment 1438414