• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Here is my tip on how to find ideal seating depth.

jamesdmock

jamesdmock

To find the ideal seating depth for a given powder and bullet a person needs to first find the jam for that bullet. Also, one needs to load at three different powder charges for each of the following seating depths. These should be a mild charge, a moderate one, and a hot load. These three loads are tested at different seating depths...starting at jam and then moving away from jam in .005 inch increments. (see picture below).

When one finds a 3-shot group that is in the same relative position with each powder charge (like those at .015 off), that is a great seating depth. After using this to find the best depth, one can tweak his best load by trying within the .005 inch window or within the .5 grain powder charge. Good shooting....James Mock
DSCF2002 (1).JPG
 
You are looking at over sixty rounds to complete your method, how often did you clean the barrel during the testing?
Did you shot the test all with a hot barrel or did you allow for cool down.
Keep up the good work.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. However, looking at the target it appears only 15 thou jump is acceptable. Does one chase the lands after a optimal charge weight has been identified?
 
Given your results, it appears the same could be accomplished with 1 each of the light, medium, and hot load. That being the case, you could just shoot each series and go with the smallest group.

Thoughts?
 
Good method in general but it does not cover enough distance. If I used that for Berger bullets in my rifles I would not have found my best seating depth. Your method stops at 0.030 off. In my 7mm RM my best depth with Berger hunting bullets is 0.070 off. My 6.5x47 likes .060 off with 140 gr Berger target bullets. I use the Berger seating depth test first, then test the area that shows promise with smaller increments. I am not dogging your method, sounds solid, just that sometimes you need to test a wider range than you have presented. I think that next time I will use the Berger test to find the best area to test, then use this for fine tuning and see how it works out. I like the part about testing with multiple loads. I am sure that will find the optimal seating depth that works independent of powder charge.

BTW, the contrast between 0.015 off and those above and below are dramatic in that example.

One more tool to tuck away for future use, thanks for sharing.
 
Interesting. Looking at the targets, seems like you could take .010 off and tweak a few tenths powder either side of the medium powder charge and have a good load that would stay consistent through conditions. Looks like 8-15 thou off is the preferred seating depth.
 
Not knocking your method by no means, and thanks a million for posting...I am always ready to learn something, but how is this different from the way Berger has said previously to find seating depth for their "VLD Hunting" bullets???? Start at bullet touching lands and load several test rounds each of cartridges at .010" deeper seated bullets then shoot them all and find the best group and work on it from there was my basic understanding. They say "one group of cartridges will group better than the others" and that is exactly what I found to be true.
Again, not trying to be facetious, but this reads as if you "discovered" something new when it is extremely very similar to what the rest of the world has been doing with Berger bullets among others. Just asking if I am missing some significant difference???? Again, thanks for posting.
 
msinc said:
Not knocking your method by no means, and thanks a million for posting...I am always ready to learn something, but how is this different from the way Berger has said previously to find seating depth for their "VLD Hunting" bullets???? Start at bullet touching lands and load several test rounds each of cartridges at .010" deeper seated bullets then shoot them all and find the best group and work on it from there was my basic understanding. They say "one group of cartridges will group better than the others" and that is exactly what I found to be true.
Again, not trying to be facetious, but this reads as if you "discovered" something new when it is extremely very similar to what the rest of the world has been doing with Berger bullets among others. Just asking if I am missing some significant difference???? Again, thanks for posting.
Click to expand...

As many have said, "There is really nothing new in the world." The ideas for the method outlined above came from three sources. I interviewed all three for PS and got their ideas and assimilated them into one idea. These three were Tony Boyer, Joe Krupa, and Jack Neary (all three are Hall of Fame Members). Later, I was told by Eric Stecker (president of Berger) to not be afraid to jump VLD bullets quite a bit (as in .040 or more). I can usually find a good load without that much jump. Tony Boyer does not start at jam, but at "just touching" and always moves into the lands. He told me that he doesn't trust jumping with short range BR bullets. Gary Ocock told me that he has used the same method for many years....that is, he always shoots BT bullets and he normally jumps them by seating the bullets .030" off of jam and tunes with powder charge. So my method outlined above is a guide for those seeking a method for tuning. Sometimes I shorten the method by starting with bullets at .005 off jam because I have not had luck with bullets at jam. Also, I may shorten the process by using only two powder charges ... mild and hot. Good shooting...James
 
jamesdmock said:
......."The ideas for the method outlined above came from three sources. I interviewed all three for PS and got their ideas"........."These three were Tony Boyer, Joe Krupa, and Jack Neary (all three are Hall of Fame Members)"......."Later, I was told by Eric Stecker (president of Berger) to not be afraid to jump VLD bullets quite a bit"......."Gary Ocock told me that he has used the same method for many years"....
Click to expand...

Now I get it...it's your opening title that is confusing to me..."Here's MY tip...."
 
James you mentioned you were looking for most stable POI, not group size. In this example the smallest groups also occurred at most stable POI; has this typically been your experience for other similar evaluations? I would assume so since that is probably your ultimate goal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Classified Ads

Forum statistics

Threads
165,771
Messages
2,202,911
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813

Share This Page

Back
Top