I am new to the forum and have been thinking about the need to glass bed the stock and install aluminum pillars in a rifle and am unsure of the physics behind this, I know that gunsmiths claim that this improves the accuracy of a rifle but I am not sure if it actually does.
Scenario #1- A scoped rifle in which the barrel is not free floating and resting on the stock. The scope is mounted directly to the reciever and does not move when firing. The stock absorbs vibrations when a shot is fired. Glass bedding would maintain a solid connection with the action and barrel absorbing vibrations and improving accuracy.This is what gunsmiths did with the older rifles especially military rifles with barrel bands.
Scenario #2- A scoped rifle in which the barrel is free floating and does not touch the stock. Only the action(reciever) is touching the stock. The scope is mounted directly to the reciever and does not move when firing. When firing freehand or with a bench rest (and the rifle is not permanently attached to the rest) the stock only holds the rifle. The barrel has vibrated with the first shot but has returned to the same position since it too is permanently attached to the reciever. The reciever, barrel, and scope have not moved independently but are still attached as one. When the target is recentered in the crosshairs of the scope, how would glass bedding and pillaring the stock improve accuracy upon shooting a second shot?
Gunsmiths now recommend that the rifle barrels be free floating and to glass bed and install pillars. The physics just does not add up to me in scenario #2 for glass bedding. Would someone explain what I am missing.
Scenario #1- A scoped rifle in which the barrel is not free floating and resting on the stock. The scope is mounted directly to the reciever and does not move when firing. The stock absorbs vibrations when a shot is fired. Glass bedding would maintain a solid connection with the action and barrel absorbing vibrations and improving accuracy.This is what gunsmiths did with the older rifles especially military rifles with barrel bands.
Scenario #2- A scoped rifle in which the barrel is free floating and does not touch the stock. Only the action(reciever) is touching the stock. The scope is mounted directly to the reciever and does not move when firing. When firing freehand or with a bench rest (and the rifle is not permanently attached to the rest) the stock only holds the rifle. The barrel has vibrated with the first shot but has returned to the same position since it too is permanently attached to the reciever. The reciever, barrel, and scope have not moved independently but are still attached as one. When the target is recentered in the crosshairs of the scope, how would glass bedding and pillaring the stock improve accuracy upon shooting a second shot?
Gunsmiths now recommend that the rifle barrels be free floating and to glass bed and install pillars. The physics just does not add up to me in scenario #2 for glass bedding. Would someone explain what I am missing.