Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry my blunder reckon l wanted to see them too badLikewise, still says files coming soon.
Sorry Vance seems they keep score like they run a match.Where? I’m the 1000 yard points keeper for LG and HG and I don’t see them.
You’ll have that on these big jobs lolSorry Vance seems they keep score like they run a match.
Jack Balon, good shooter.Who won ?
The problem wasn’t with individual targets. The problem was with overall results in which results were never posted at the match to be able to question.I brought a mistake to Jeff Greens attention after the awards were handed out and he promptly corrected it. Everybody was told to double check their targets and bring up any errors and where given a card to keep track of their scores and agg them. If Jeff Green didn't know of a problem how could he fix it.
That was my problem I kept track of my scores and groups aged them and told Jeff that I was pretty sure I won Factory, he got with the Match director rechecked groups and re agged them and awarded me 1st place. Cavalier had some major problems running their first national and their computer program had issues I guarantee it won't happen next year.The problem wasn’t with individual targets. The problem was with overall results in which results were never posted at the match to be able to question.
Well put some shooters didn't even have their scores agged but someone else's because of the computer input or program problems.To date, six friends have called me and all said that "somebody on accurateshooter says you did not win the match". I will tell all of you the same thing that I told these 6 friends, and that is...... the man might be right, and he may be wrong, but I don't think anyone has all the information needed to know for sure.
I say that no one has all the information to be sure because of the way that match was scored and the way these "results" are posted. I am not here to argue my case because at this point I think that anyone that shot these Nationals lost. We all lost because these posted scores will always be questioned and never trusted. If you were there, you know exactly what I am talking about. At no point were interim results posted after relays, and at no point were any cumulative results posted after the first day. No one knew what was going on, and looking at hung targets only made it worse. I have two targets that had the group size scribbled out and changed two times, and I am sure that many other shooters had the same experience. Speaking just for myself, I have one target that was measured at 3.799 inches and was obviously wrong. I questioned it, and after someone qualified measured it, the group size was revised correctly to 2.175 inches. I have errors made on the math total for total score after 6 targets, and I know that many other shooters experienced the same frustration.
Regarding the RKS post about LG score results......the problem is that these score results are shown as a gross two-digit averages. Averages are NEVER to be used because only the exact cumulative score total after 6 targets matters. To use myself as an example....my average is shown as 47. In one case, 47.0 x 6 = 282, however, in another case 47.9 x 6 = 287. In both examples, the gross two-digit average is 47, but you can see the big difference when you total the actual scores for 6 relays. In my case, my LG average is shown as 47, but my real combined score is 284.
To use Travis Massie as an example.....I need to say that I do not know Travis and have zero information about what his actual LV totals might be. Anyway, his two-digit average score of 46 can really mean 46.0 x 6 = 276 and everything in between up to 46.9 x 6=281. Again, averages are NEVER used because your REAL combined 6 target score can vary 5 points. Travis may have totaled 281, and RKS would be right that Travis should have finished seventh. However, if Travis finished closer to 276, then many other shooters with 46's may have TOTALED higher than him and received a better score placement. I do not know, and you do not know, and the GBA probably doesn't know
I did not want to come on here. Anyone that knows me understands that I never want to win under any doubt or protest, and I never want to criticize a match. I run two different matches, and know how hard it can be. Travis Massie may have won, and he may have not won. Based on all the scoring and group size errors experienced by many shooters, there may be a totally different shooter that won! As I said earlier I think that anyone that shot those Nationals lost, and that includes me.
If anyone wants to discuss this with me further, send me a PM. I am not going to say anything more publicly than I have.
Jack Balon