• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Forster COAX Press In Stock

A press will not cause nor help runout. All it does is push a case in the die and pull it out. If youre getting runout after sizing its your die or your necks need to be turned
Dusty your the man!
You just saved Lee 1000 $350
 
Well I’ve already bought it, hope it fixes it. Equipment I’ve been using is below. After shooting neck runout is 0, after sizing it’s 0.001 and after seating bullet runout between the ogive and tip is anywhere from 0 to 12mils. Average ~6 and completely inconsistent.

If this doesn’t fix it I’m going to start turning necks. I have a annealing machine but haven’t used it yet.

-Press was Lee Classic Cast Breach Lock (first press). I paid to have it shipped to Lee and they said it was the she’ll hold retainer....BS. I tried all the tricks, floating the shell holder with a oring, floating the die with a oring, nothing helped.
-I’ve replaced a Lee Collet die with a second one and that didn’t fix it.
-Using Lapua brass
-Forster Micrometer seater die with a stem matched to bullets by Forster.
-Reloading for 308
-Bullets are 155gr SMK Palma
 
So it pretty much happens upon seating. You have a brass neck thickness issue id bet. Your equipment is adequate enough for sure. After sizing and getting .001 proves that. You could always try a wilson type hand die
 
Well I’ve already bought it, hope it fixes it. Equipment I’ve been using is below. After shooting neck runout is 0, after sizing it’s 0.001 and after seating bullet runout between the ogive and tip is anywhere from 0 to 12mils. Average ~6 and completely inconsistent.

If this doesn’t fix it I’m going to start turning necks. I have a annealing machine but haven’t used it yet.

-Press was Lee Classic Cast Breach Lock (first press). I paid to have it shipped to Lee and they said it was the she’ll hold retainer....BS. I tried all the tricks, floating the shell holder with a oring, floating the die with a oring, nothing helped.
-I’ve replaced a Lee Collet die with a second one and that didn’t fix it.
-Using Lapua brass
-Forster Micrometer seater die with a stem matched to bullets by Forster.
-Reloading for 308
-Bullets are 155gr SMK Palma

Sounds like you've traveled exactly the same road I did (except the bullets I used were 168 SMK's). The Lee Classic press I have just wasn't giving me the results I was looking for. Was able to get some pretty good results . . . some of the times. I just couldn't find the consistency I was looking for until I got the Co Ax. And I will add, the Co Ax also sped up the process for me.

You definitely should start annealing on a regular basis, and . . . turn those necks. Both those things made a significant difference for me, not only with runout, but also with ES's and SD's and how it prints on paper.

I even like using the primer seating tool on the Co Ax, as I get consistent seating depth with it and the way I've got it set up, it's as fast or fast than using a hand priming tool (like the Lee Auto-Primer).
 
If you want to get an good idea of what the differences between press's can be (like in terms of run out), check out the details in this comparison (it just might be an eye opener):

https://ultimatereloader.com/2019/04/08/fourteen-reloading-presses-compared-single-stage-shootout/


https://ultimatereloader.com/2019/0...ng-presses-compared-single-stage-shootout/15/
Yea, but I’m not near hip enough, or nerdy, or something to watch all of one of his videos.
 
bullet runout between the ogive and tip is anywhere from 0 to 12mils. Average ~6 and completely inconsistent.
Is this the "normal" place to measure runout? Would it measure any different if you moved back to full bullet diameter?
 
Is this the "normal" place to measure runout? Would it measure any different if you moved back to full bullet diameter?

Ideally I’d have 0 at the bullet tip. I’ve always measured runout at this location so the measurements are relative to all others....Too much
 
Something to think about since it apparently is during the seating process...I had this issue crop up once and it ended up being the seater stem "cup" or "cone" depth being too shallow for longer more pointed tip bullets...the tip of the bullet was all that was bottoming out up in the seater stem...so the bullet was getting seated off of its tip rather than contacting somewhere on the ogive...a "new and improved" seater stem cured the run out issue...bullets now are seating off the ogive. I had the exact same scenario as you...everything stayed straight until seating and then it was all over the place. A well respected site member posed this possibility to my dilemma and it was the problem...sometimes it can be the simplest of things.

Gene
 
While it is nice that someone is attempting to get to the bottom of things the test design has so many issues as to be statically flawed from start to finish both in the studies design and it's execution. I am not an engineer but have worked in engineering for decades in the automotive manufacturing world. First the level of precision that people think they are loading too is fraught with clearance and tolerance stacking issues in every single part of the die, reloading press parts and the brass and projectiles. Then you have all the clearance issues, concentrically issues and tolerance stacking and variability in every part of the rifle and the rest and so on.....If you tested 10,000 presses you would get huge variable to the point that it would start to look random. On top of that as the gear is used and rusts and suffers wear no one is measuring their gear and re-calibrating everything with each lot of ammo produced. The vertical moving rod that presses the case into the die is larger than the base of the cartridge and the shell holder itself is not precision machined. The rod, shell holder, primer, case and bullet are not all being held concentrically precise and as they all rust and wear the numbers will change!Any run out is mostly about the die in relationship to the bullet and the brass. I have Sinclair, RCBS, Hornady, Lee and Dillion 550B relaoding presses, tooling and measuring gear. My wife is trained as a machinist and we both have insane measuring gear. I own Zeiss and Swarovski microscopes and measuring gear I just purchased a 4 ball Zeiss bore gauge and calibrating equipment. I own multi channel 400Mhz Ocilliscopes with analog and digital capability and spectrum analyzer's that I own for fun just for a hobby use! Chasing ammo's accuracy potential based on the press being used is barking up the wrong tree. Obviously the Forester Coax press has the potential to produce the most accurate ammo but that statement is fraught with assumptions. The case prep and precision of the die's and how well the brass and the bullet fit the die are the biggies! The seating stem and how well it handles the huge variety of VLD shapes is a huge factor! Precision is important but were it pays off and were it is a waste of time to pursue is the secret to using your time wisely and spending your money wisely. Case Prep and die precision and fit with the brass and bullets you are using are the most important. Knowing what to measure and how to work the brass is HUGE!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,315
Messages
2,216,392
Members
79,554
Latest member
GerSteve
Back
Top