• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Firing/Sizing Effect on Brass Physical Properties - Posted for Comment

I've puzzled over this topic for some time, and have not seen any definitive article on what happens to brass when it is fired and resized. I finally put some time into it, and this is what I came up with. This post has been made to share what I found, and will welcome any comments on whether or not it makes any sense. I'll admit the results surprised me, and I wonder if I've made a slip in my calculations/assumptions somewhere. In any case here it is.

First, I stumbled on this rather dated article on the properties of 70-30 Brass:

Tensile Stress-Strain Curves of a 70-30 Brass

It contains some rather useful data and graphs. In particular figure 4 (Adobe page 13), shows the stress-strain relationship of cartridge brass in 6 different annealed states. For this discussion I will only refer to the top normal annealed state, which is probably quite close to as supplied annealed brass. This graph shows the stress in brass as it is stretched well beyond yield. Figure 1 shows what it does before yield.

I first calculated the strain a 6BR neck undergoes when a bullet is loaded with 0.001" neck tension, and then fired in a chamber with 0.003 additional clearance. I worked that out to be simply 0.004/0.268 or 0.015 strain, for as fired, and 0.001/0.268 or 0.0037 for as seated. This is well beyond the elastic limit which would be reached at less than 0.001 strain (figure 1). What happens when you stretch brass this much is that it just follows the stress strain line up to the strain level of 0.015. This corresponds to a stress level of 28,000 psi. When the cartridge is fired this stress level is retained as the new yield limit. When you resize it, it undergoes the same stress level, but in reverse. It work hardens again, up to a stress level of 40,000 psi. The graph at the end of this post shows this graphically. The yellow highlighted lines are the first firing and resizing cycle. The green the second, and the pink the third. This is a summary of the stresses:

Starting Point - Before Seating, After Seating, After Firing, After Sizing
Annealed - 17,000, 24,000, 28,000, 40,000
Fired 1X, Sized 1X - 40,000, 47,000, 56,000, 80,000
Fired 2X, Sized 2X - 80,000, 92,000, 110,000, 150,000

What you can see is that the brass work hardens very quickly and gains higher and high yield strength. What are the conclusions?

1. Brass yields when we seat bullets. Since it is yielding the stress-strain curve is quite flat. So double the seating tension only increases stress a bit, and far from double. On the first firing 0.001" would be about 24,000 psi, while 0.002" is 26,000, or only an 8% increase in seating grip.

2. One firing and resizing cycle work hardens brass a lot. It is virtually doubling each cycle. If you mix brass of different firing cycles there will be huge differences in neck tension.

3. 150,000 yield is reached in 3 firing cycles. That is around the limit of what brass can take. It seems a miracle that it lasts much beyond that. Perhaps I have an error somewhere... But, it does suggest more frequent annealing is better than less frequent.

4. The modulus of elasticity of brass is 17 million psi. One thou neck tension results in 67,000 psi if the brass is still below yield. This will be reached after 2 firings. At that point neck tension starts to go up significantly with increased fit. For example after the third firing yield will be 150,000. One thou neck tension will give 67,000 stress, and two thou now will be double at 134,000 psi. This is because there is no yielding.

I have some other thoughts on the affect of annealing but will leave that for another post.

Comments? Questions?

Edit: Added point #4.
 

Attachments

  • BrassCycle.jpg
    BrassCycle.jpg
    90.3 KB · Views: 75
All the more reason to get a tighter neck chamber, neck turn and only neck size your brass I guess...I haven't read the article but I have a hard time believing it gets to 150K in 3 firing/sizings...But, maybe it does.
 
Ron. My experience is entirely consistent with you conclusions. The most dramatic difference I saw working with my 6mm BR came with annealing. The effect has also been visible but less so with some of the larger calibers. The difference is the chamber clearence in the neck. MY 6mmBR has a "no-turn" chamber for the old Lapua brass but I turn the necks so there is a lot of clearance. I've never done a cast to measure the chamber but I suspect it could be 0.006 or 0.008 inches. The thing shoots great but I had all sorts of problems getting the ES down until I annealed the brass and then it was like night and day. I believe that the effects you are discussing should be greater with a smaller caliber, but even with the bigger calibers with 0.003 to 0.004 inches clearence, I still use the annealer before every match or testing session to reset all of the cases I load and have been very pleased with the resulting consistency. Nice work.
 
After reading this I am even more happy I spent the money for my benchsource annealing machine.I have saved so much brass with it now it has paid for itself in about 2 weeks.My sizing is so much easier and seating is a breeze in my .243 cases especially.I took a chance without knowing this and I am glad you put this post up as it justifys spending money this way.All my friends thought I was nuts,LOL Great article,keep it coming.
 
SpencerC said:
All the more reason to get a tighter neck chamber, neck turn and only neck size your brass I guess...I haven't read the article but I have a hard time believing it gets to 150K in 3 firing/sizings...But, maybe it does.

Assuming it does, then this has a significant effect on increased neck fit. When the brass yields at a low stress then neck fit has a minor effect. However, once the yield stress goes but the brass becomes elastic and fit does have a major effect. I added point #4 to the original quote to try and clarify.

This has some good and bad aspects. On the plus side it makes neck fit a tool to adjust the grip on the bullet once yield has been increased. On the negative side if you do not have good control of neck fit, variability of grip will be increased.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,289
Messages
2,192,595
Members
78,786
Latest member
Vyrinn
Back
Top