memilanuk
Gold $$ Contributor
Hello,
In past I've usually gotten 'good enough' results from loading up a dummy round, clapping a dial caliper on it and selecting a bushing thats 0.003" under that reading... enough neck tension to keep things from moving, but not so much as to make the expander ball work the neck too hard and pull things out of place. This time around I've got an itch to fiddle a litte bit w/ the neck tension. I've done it before, but not in anything really resembling a defined and methodical process. FWIW, I'm using Redding Competition seater and Type 'S' F/L bushing dies w/ the floating carbide expander ball.
Re-checked a load I worked up this spring for the .243 Win: 115gr DTAC, 47.5gr H1000, neck-turned Winchester case, 215M primer. Played w/ seating depth the other day, and went from 0.020" off to 0.015" in,relative to the 'jam' reading w/ my Stoney Point tool). Groups went from scattered and strung kinda vertical,0.020" off) to a neat round hole .3-.4" in size at jam length, to a literal horizontal line across the aim point as approached 0.015" into the lands. Kind of cool to watch in progress!
Question is... am I correct in supposing that neck tension is the next correct parameter to mess with here in hopes of shrinking the group size a bit more? I have neck bushings several thou below and above the current size that I'm using,.268")... nice having L.E. Wilson Tool & Die just the next town over
Thanks,
Monte
In past I've usually gotten 'good enough' results from loading up a dummy round, clapping a dial caliper on it and selecting a bushing thats 0.003" under that reading... enough neck tension to keep things from moving, but not so much as to make the expander ball work the neck too hard and pull things out of place. This time around I've got an itch to fiddle a litte bit w/ the neck tension. I've done it before, but not in anything really resembling a defined and methodical process. FWIW, I'm using Redding Competition seater and Type 'S' F/L bushing dies w/ the floating carbide expander ball.
Re-checked a load I worked up this spring for the .243 Win: 115gr DTAC, 47.5gr H1000, neck-turned Winchester case, 215M primer. Played w/ seating depth the other day, and went from 0.020" off to 0.015" in,relative to the 'jam' reading w/ my Stoney Point tool). Groups went from scattered and strung kinda vertical,0.020" off) to a neat round hole .3-.4" in size at jam length, to a literal horizontal line across the aim point as approached 0.015" into the lands. Kind of cool to watch in progress!
Question is... am I correct in supposing that neck tension is the next correct parameter to mess with here in hopes of shrinking the group size a bit more? I have neck bushings several thou below and above the current size that I'm using,.268")... nice having L.E. Wilson Tool & Die just the next town over

Thanks,
Monte