• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Federal gold medal match small rifle vs federal small rifle primers

They cost more, therefore they must shoot better! Maybe!

The word match is a marketing ploy! Think about all those match barrels. Have you ever seen anyone advertise their not match barrels?

Frank
has anyone tried both and seen a difference between them accuracy wise?
This is for 223 reloads
Match primers have a thicker cup, and are definitely more consistent, resulting in better accuracy.
I've tried them both with several manufacturers
 
Last edited:
Years ago, I called Federal and asked. What they told me was that within a given lot, that the regular 205s were probably as uniform as the 205Ms but that for the match primers they tried to hold more lot to lot consistency. What this means to me is that for the 205s when I change lots, I should probably look at doing a slight retune, if the application warrants it, which would be my tight neck duce bench gun, my 6PPC or my best 6BRA. For other rifles, I am pretty sure that a ground squirrel would not be able to tell the difference.
 
has anyone tried both and seen a difference between them accuracy wise?
This is for 223 reloads
A few years back I ventured into long range paper. I am not a chronograph guy but realizing the value of small ES I started to work at it. At the time I had 3 match rifles. All built on Pandas. A 6PPC, a 6.5x47, and a 6BRX. They all had ES in the middle teens. Without doing anything but changing primers I shot them with all the popular primers. They all remained in the teens. My primer of choice up until then had been CCI BR4s. I had never owned 205M or shot any. I tried all 3 rifles with them and they all went to single didgets. Coincidence, probably but they are all I have used ever since. The only big difference I have noticed in accuracy was in my hunting rifles in .280 with H4831. They were always a bit more accurate with magnum versions . Just my experiences. Just for the record, that game while teaching me some things did not excite me.
 
Last edited:
To answer the OP’s question, yes, in years past many Short Range Group and Score shooters have done head to head test with both.

If there is a difference, I darn sure can’t tell.

I recently traded two bricks of the 205 Match even for two bricks of regular 205’s because I didn’t want different types to use in my 6PPC and 30BR.
 
I know that. Don't know anybody that uses the 200.
After further research, Butch I stand corrected, I have learned something new today, thanks for your patience.
I'm wondering why Fed 200 is in that chart. #200 is small magnum pistol primer. Comparing 200 to Fed 205 vs Fed 205M doesn't seem to make any sense to me.
1685316304266.png
 
Last edited:
Federal uses people that are known to be the best and most consistent in making the primers. The ones they make are the MATCH primers. There are all kinds of videos on youtube that show this. It is just how Federal does it. They are not any different than the regular productions ones.
 
Sorry, that's not true in Federal's case. They are the same. The match primers pass an extra visual inspection only.
Unless they changed the specifications, the cup thickness on #205M (match primers) is .225 versus .019 for #200.

As far as "consistency", I cannot comment of that aspect since I've never used #200's.

However, I can say with confidence that I could detect no difference between Federal large rifle match primers versus their standard primers from a performance standpoint.
 
Unless they changed the specifications, the cup thickness on #205M (match primers) is .225 versus .019 for #200.

As far as "consistency", I cannot comment of that aspect since I've never used #200's.

However, I can say with confidence that I could detect no difference between Federal large rifle match primers versus their standard primers from a performance standpoint.
was this in a custom built benchrest rifle....
about the only place that the diff would be noticed
hunting rifles need not apply
( and the 200 is NOT a small rifle primer so the diff does not matter)
 
At one time Federal did have a No. 200 small rifle primer. I believe that was prior the introduction of the 223 Rem that required a primer with a higher pressure capability than other small rifle cartridges. Along the lines of the Rem 6-1/2 and 7-1/2.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,874
Messages
2,185,523
Members
78,541
Latest member
LBanister
Back
Top