They cost more, therefore they must shoot better! Maybe!
The word match is a marketing ploy! Think about all those match barrels. Have you ever seen anyone advertise their not match barrels?
Frank
Match primers have a thicker cup, and are definitely more consistent, resulting in better accuracy.has anyone tried both and seen a difference between them accuracy wise?
This is for 223 reloads
Sorry, that's not true in Federal's case. They are the same. The match primers pass an extra visual inspection only.Match primers have a thicker cup, and are definitely more consistent, resulting in better accuracy.
I've tried them both with several manufacturers
the about includes primer chart from this forumSorry, that's not true in Federal's case. They are the same. The match primers pass an extra visual inspection only.
I don't know what you are referring to on the chart. The 205 and 205M are identical. I speaking of no other primers.the about includes primer chart from this forum
I don't know
I'm referring to the physical differences between the Fed. SR 200 and the 205M, the 205 is not listedI don't know what you are referring to on the chart. The 205 and 205M are identical. I speaking of no other primers.
I know that. Don't know anybody that uses the 200.I'm referring to the physical differences between the Fed. SR 200 and the 205M, the 205 is not listed
After further research, Butch I stand corrected, I have learned something new today, thanks for your patience.I know that. Don't know anybody that uses the 200.
A few years back I ventured into long range paper. I am not a chronograph guy but realizing the value of small ES I started to work at it. At the time I had 3 match rifles. All built on Pandas. A 6PPC, a 6.5x47, and a 6BRX. They all had ES in the middle teens. Without doing anything but changing primers I shot them with all the popular primers. They all remained in the teens. My primer of choice up until then had been CCI BR4s. I had never owned 205M or shot any. I tried all 3 rifles with them and they all went to single didgets. Coincidence, probably but they are all I have used ever since. The only big difference I have noticed in accuracy was in my hunting rifles in .280 with H4831. They were always a bit more accurate with magnum versions . Just my experiences. Just for the record, that game while teaching me some things did not excite me.has anyone tried both and seen a difference between them accuracy wise?
This is for 223 reloads
I know that. Don't know anybody that uses the 200.
I'm wondering why Fed 200 is in that chart. #200 is small magnum pistol primer. Comparing 200 to Fed 205 vs Fed 205M doesn't seem to make any sense to me.After further research, Butch I stand corrected, I have learned something new today, thanks for your patience.
Unless they changed the specifications, the cup thickness on #205M (match primers) is .225 versus .019 for #200.Sorry, that's not true in Federal's case. They are the same. The match primers pass an extra visual inspection only.
was this in a custom built benchrest rifle....Unless they changed the specifications, the cup thickness on #205M (match primers) is .225 versus .019 for #200.
As far as "consistency", I cannot comment of that aspect since I've never used #200's.
However, I can say with confidence that I could detect no difference between Federal large rifle match primers versus their standard primers from a performance standpoint.