I wasn't going to say anything , I thought he may have gotten a pm from the op. But ..
The only reason I did was because, based on the numbers the op provided, it seemed to me to be a serious potential safety hazard if fired.
I'm not gonna blame or bash anyone and don't know what explains the discrepancy between Stan's numbers and what the op has or that the measurements are good or not.
But math is math and the numbers provided show .106" bolt to barrel clearance...Not the extractor. but the bolt nose. There should be a relief on one side(end) of the barrel tenon to give the extractor clearance at proper tenon length. I don't recall the depth of the extractor relief but I'd guess....030"...I'm going by memory here. That clearance has been put there because it is needed in the ones I've seen. The extractor would hit the end of the barrel tenon without it as it stands proud of the bolt nose by a few thou.
Even with it, the numbers told me that we had was .106" bolt to barrel clearance, when .003-.010" is more typical, and @ .006" clearance, that coincidentally add up to a nice, round, .100" mor than "typical". Typical doesn't make it right or wrong.
Also typically, bolt faces on MOST guns are between say .120-.150" deep. @.150+ .106" bolt to barrel clearance, you have .256 unsupported case...About .100 more than is "typical" also, but then the solid portion of most brass is also nominally about .150 thick, too. Again, about .100 too much unsupported case, IMO. That's A LOT!
Now, if the bolt nose is only .059 deep, that changes things a bit. We now have what, .165 clearance? Bad but not nearly as bad as .256!!!! Hugely different!
I made my post not to stir any debate but to keep the op from taking anything in this thread as saying he should shoot it like it is without verifying that it is safe. It sounds dangerous as hell to me...based on the numbers the op posted just before my post.
I didn't mean to ruffle anybody's feathers...It was and is there out of legitimate and IMO, justifiable concerns, for the safety of anyone firing a gun with the aforementioned clearances.
There...I say talk to your smith. Get everything verified and checked. I won't assume that he made a mistake without having it in my hands but it looks a lot like the tenon was cut short by an even .100" ---Mike
p.s.---I shouldn't have even posted my previous post but there were and are a lot of coincidences. I still say that there should not be an unexplained .106" clearance between the bolt and the tenon. If that's proper, there is no need in the extractor relief in the end of the barrel.