Has anyone objectively measured the difference on-target between using a quality sizing die and a custom sizing die?
I mostly shoot mid range F-T/R and have recently switched back to .308 as I'd like to compete in a 1000 yard competition. I noticed that my seating die was not 'correctly' set up and was bumping my shoulders back .007 rather than a more typical .002. This, of course, is not the dies fault. As I started adjusting the die, I noticed it was my small base die so, I switched to the full length die and adjusted it to size brass with a .002 shoulder bump.
I will be the first to admit that this has not been a smooth transition back to the .308. Gun handling issues that the .223 hides are now evident.
The pic below was shot at 600 yards using the brass with the .007 shoulder bump and sized with the SB die:

The next picture is brass sized by the FL sizing die with a .002 shoulder bump:

Other than a modest increase in X count which could be important, there isn't much difference in the two groups. About 50% of the brass that was sized by the FL sizer resulted in very mild clickers. There have never been any clickers when using the SB die.
I can't say for sure that all of the 9s were my fault but shot 20 on the second target was for sure. What I can say is that there is a lot of room for improvement in the gun handling department! There was really no wind during either string.
I can image that if I had a custom sizing die made, I wouldn't run a side-by-side comparison shoot. What would be the point? Interested to know if any of y'all have measured a difference.
Thanks for the longish read,
Henryrifle
I mostly shoot mid range F-T/R and have recently switched back to .308 as I'd like to compete in a 1000 yard competition. I noticed that my seating die was not 'correctly' set up and was bumping my shoulders back .007 rather than a more typical .002. This, of course, is not the dies fault. As I started adjusting the die, I noticed it was my small base die so, I switched to the full length die and adjusted it to size brass with a .002 shoulder bump.
I will be the first to admit that this has not been a smooth transition back to the .308. Gun handling issues that the .223 hides are now evident.
The pic below was shot at 600 yards using the brass with the .007 shoulder bump and sized with the SB die:

The next picture is brass sized by the FL sizing die with a .002 shoulder bump:

Other than a modest increase in X count which could be important, there isn't much difference in the two groups. About 50% of the brass that was sized by the FL sizer resulted in very mild clickers. There have never been any clickers when using the SB die.
I can't say for sure that all of the 9s were my fault but shot 20 on the second target was for sure. What I can say is that there is a lot of room for improvement in the gun handling department! There was really no wind during either string.
I can image that if I had a custom sizing die made, I wouldn't run a side-by-side comparison shoot. What would be the point? Interested to know if any of y'all have measured a difference.
Thanks for the longish read,
Henryrifle