A perfectly straight loaded round with .0000 bullet run-out might be the goal but has anyone done any group testing to try and measure the impact on accuracy of say .0005....to .0015 run-out? I other words, when is enough...enough?
Ben
				
			Ben
;D ;Dtom said:If you want to screw with your competitors, just buy em a concentricity guage, crony, and press with seat force.
Tom
ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜savagedasher said:;D ;D;D ;Dtom said:If you want to screw with your competitors, just buy em a concentricity guage, crony, and press with seat force.
Tom
"...has anyone done any testing?"BenPerfected said:A perfectly straight loaded round with .0000 bullet run-out might be the goal but has anyone done any group testing to try and measure the impact on accuracy of say .0005....to .0015 run-out? I other words, when is enough...enough?
Ben
"Just because we can not know everything does not mean that we can not know anything."mikecr said:Anyone doing any testing won't help.
An actual scientific method applied to actually answer the question, would be very difficult/expensive to pull off.
For example, you would need test barrels finished with representative cartridges of varying length/width, each with test barrels finished at different tolerances/FB/throats, then you get into bullet ogives & length, load development to baselines, reload sizing systems for various amount of separated body runout to neck only to bullet seated only runouts and headspacings and pin striking.
All this before any notions across the gamut could hold as credible.
