Savageseven
Gold $$ Contributor
when you find a flat spot in your velocity as a possable node do you always choose the one with the fastest velocity first to work to see if its going to work ?
Are you plotting charge vs 1 shot fps? If so there is no flat spot it's just ignoring the fact that there is ES. Most guys look for a small 5 shot group with a small group .3 gr under and over.when you find a flat spot in your velocity as a possable node do you always choose the one with the fastest velocity first to work to see if its going to work ?
Yup^^^^^
What he said .![]()
i loaded them up in 5 shot groups then wrote down my average fps on the 5 shots.Are you plotting charge vs 1 shot fps? If so there is no flat spot it's just ignoring the fact that there is ES. Most guys look for a small 5 shot group with a small group .3 gr under and over.
Yep. On this forum I would guesstimate 90% use this method based on the flat spot on the target (indicating harmonic compensation) while the remaining 10% want to use velocity.Does it coincide with a flat spot on target?
so is one really better then the other ?Yep. On this forum I would guesstimate 90% use this method based on the flat spot on the target (indicating harmonic compensation) while the remaining 10% want to use velocity.
Now Layne got some good advise....I dint even mention barrel life...orSince you are talking about pushing a .243 at 3400plus
Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but if you only gained 9 FPS over half of grain of powder, that’s not two nodes, that’s one node, it’s wide, and 46.3 sounds like a real fine load to me.this is for a 243 winchester shooting a 70 grain nosler ballistic tip using imr 4350
at 46.0 grains of powder my avaerage over 5 shots was 3481 fps
at 46.5 my average over 5 shots was 3490 fps