Bushnell 4200 series scopes

[whelen35]

How does the Bushnell 4200 series scopes stack up against their competitors, specifically the 4-16x40 and the 6-24x40? I own several scopes including Zeiss Conquest, Leupold VX-III, Nightforce NXS, and the Nikon Monarch. Would the Bushnell 4200 be comparable in resolution to any of these scopes. How about the tracking?

 

[mysticplayer]

I own several 6X24 AO mil dot 4200 scopes and have used most every model over the years. Mechanicals are very reliable and repeatable. Optics are really good and are equal/better then the Nikon Monarch. I find the resolution easier for my eyes then in most Leupold scopes. Low light is superb.

The only downside is the limited elevation adjustment. That is why I use the mildot reticle so I can shim the scope for extended ranges.

Jerry

 

[whelen35]

Jerry,

Thank you for sharing your experience with the 4200. I'm going to order one and give it a try.

 

[fireball10x]

I have the 4200 4x16x50 on my 204 and it is a great scope really bright and repeatable I also have a 3200 on my fireball and it works great it's a 5x15x50