My next rifle will be a 6.5 Creed with a 1.8 twist barrel. I'll only be shooting out to 300yrds. (paper). Would I get better accuracy from a lighter bullet 90gr-100gr, than from a 140gr, or should I go heavier?
I shoot target to make my hunting shots more accurate. I favor the 130/140 gr bullets in the 6.5CM. 90-100 gr are very light for the 6.5 and with your twist, I think the tune will be easier. But as I said, I'm always looking at shots on game as my end goal.Would I get better accuracy from a lighter bullet 90gr-100gr, than from a 140gr, or should I go heavier?
130-143g is perfect for that twist in a 6.5CM.My next rifle will be a 6.5 Creed with a 1.8 twist barrel. I'll only be shooting out to 300yrds. (paper). Would I get better accuracy from a lighter bullet 90gr-100gr, than from a 140gr, or should I go heavier?
It was indeed developed around 140s.It's my understanding that the 6.5 CM platform was created around the 140 gr bullet weight? Maybe, but regardless, I have gotten good results out to 1000 (.5 MOA) using 140 gr Hornady ELD-Ms. Not match winning accuracy certainly, but I'm happy with the results.![]()
Is the Berger 130 your referring to the AR hybrid? I see them in stock at a couple of places now.I fell into the heavy bullet craze for a long time. There's no denying that a 140gr Berger hybrid target is an exceptional bullet and performs very well in this cartridge. I even shot the 147 ELD-M for a season. Now i find myself shooting the 135 A-tip and the 130gr Berger OTM. In my experience, in my rifles(sample of 2), the 130 class bullet allows for a higher powder charge and my tune window seems to be more forgiving. I am shooting PRS, not bench or F-class, so my requirements for accuracy may not be as strict, But im still looking for SD's under 7-8 and consistent 1/2" groups. frequently, these bullet combos are exceeding that.
The added velocity I get from the 130 class bullet wipes out any B.C. differences, especially with the A-tip going ~ 2870. and the advertised G7 at .321. (thats a spicy load however)
Dont be scared to try some lighter bullets is all im saying. If you do your part behind the rifle, they will do their part down range. Component supplies for 6.5 are still scarce for the heavy stuff. Berger.....Grrrrr
At such a short range I would go something in a flat base around 120 grains and push it quickMy next rifle will be a 6.5 Creed with a 1.8 twist barrel. I'll only be shooting out to 300yrds. (paper). Would I get better accuracy from a lighter bullet 90gr-100gr, than from a 140gr, or should I go heavier?
Yes. I had a few hundred sitting in my shop for a few years that i never tried because of the loads i had going with the 140's. Now that ive run out of 140's, im glad i did. I was pretty spiteful towards the creedmoor after loading it for several years. In my cases, i found that my optimal load windows were very narrow and could be down right picky. However, i was comparing myself to my fellow match shooters running BR's and Dashers that made my loadings look like trash, and for a while it got in my head that i was not placing well in matches due to my ammunition. Im also not saying that loading a 130 class bullet made my rifle shoot like a BR, but I wish I would have tried these bullets sooner.Is the Berger 130 your referring to the AR hybrid? I see them in stock at a couple of places now.
There are good match bullets in the 107-120 gr range that will work great inside 300 yards. Save on powder and recoil. 140+ is not necessary for short range ...
For shooting 300 yards at paper is there a specific reason you chose the 6.5cm? To me a 6br/6ppc/Dasher etc would be a better choice???