• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Beware the Cheapie Lathes

Some problems with lathe run outs and reaming a hole
Most of the experienced people know exactly what it is but the majority of people don’t, mainly because they have had no formal machining education and had to learn everything the hard way, by trial and error, and in most cases a lot of errors are made. Runout on diameters is derived from TIR,total indicator reading/deflection) which is the swing of the indicator needle to its extremity on both the plus and minus side of the diameter you are checking. Runout is exactly half of the TIR. If the TIR is .005 then the runout for this particular piece is .0025, or eccentric by that same amount. Not to be confused with elliptical/out of round conditions etc .When 2 or more diameters on the same shaft,part) have one common center, they are said to be concentric to each other but they also have to be in alignment for the length of each diameter. These two criteria must be met for concentricity. Conversely if they are not, they are said to be eccentric to each other and just how much is determined by the TIR and runout is then established. A diameter can still be considered concentric even if it is tapered as long as the two centers are coincidental. This is mostly for round parts . TIR plays a very important role on flat surfaces too. The total swing of the needle tells you how much it deviates out of flatness, alignment and straightness on the surface to be regulated by its tolerance alone. A part print tolerance of “flat within .001” means exactly that. The TIR has to be .001 or less. If it’s out of tolerance one can say it runs out, outside its tolerance.
Here’s where a lot of the problems start, right at the lathe that’s doing the boring/reaming /turning etc. Some of the older lathes that are of higher quality ,Hardinge/Sheldon/Monark/P&W/Clauson etc) have no problem with this, but many of the imported ones and I class some of the Chinese clunkers in with this, but not all. Not every lathe is centered correctly but it is never noticed by the inexperienced because he doesn’t do really close work. This is where it really shows up even though gunsmithing is not close work. “Close” is relevant. Some think .005 is close, others, .0002 and under is, all depending upon the person/experience and knowledge.. To check lathe runout it’s done with set up tapers which are a set of two hardened diameters built on a usually #2 Morse Taper or what have you, and made in sets. They have a 4.00/6.00 long OD that is ground to the same diameter. One is inserted in the head and the other one in the tailstock and an indicator run along them to see if there‘s any TIR deflection. In many cases the two do NOT match up on both the YY and ZZ. This means that one may be higher than the other. The tailstock setover controls the YY,but not alignment) but now we do not have any adjustments for the ZZ. They HAVE to be at the same height and the best way is to shim the headstock. Moreover, if the tailstock is set so it will not cut a taper on a turned bar, it can still be out of alignment and will show up immediately on reaming as the reamer will cut oversize as the hand wheel is advanced. This condition will enable any reamer, whether it be a plain /spiral or chambering to cut large. Some lathes have been as much as .0015 out of alignment with the tailstock and it’s a nightmare to get it right. You can readily see if the tailstock be lower/higher than the headstock and you want to chamber ream, the reamer will cut oversize if held in the tailstock chuck. Even free floating it OC, will produce a strain on the reamer and it will cut larger near the end even though it be piloted. Yes, the diameter if piloted will be concentric to the bore but it’s not the chamber/or hole that you want. You have to your advantage a 4 jaw and end control that you can align the bore OC but the tailstock center has to be bugs nuts in relation to this to achieve a perfect ream. The law also says that if a trued and rounded part whether it be OD/ID is indicated in on three of its quadrants then the fourth HAS to follow. If it does not, you have a problem somewhere else and it may be related to the machine itself. If the headstock is not perfectly parallel to the ways/alignment of the tailstock the resulting chamber will not be in alignment with the bore, thus increasing throat erosion quicker on the one side. If the head is out of alignment even a small amount it can create a real PITA to indicate in a barrel prior to chambering. Giving this condition, the threads and any other diameter that you turn will be in perfect concentricity at the same set up, but once an unaligned tailstock is employed, the reamer will again cut large, but still be concentric. Both head and tailstock must be perfectly aligned to achieve a perfect reamed hole. It’s basically the same thing as boring/reaming a hole on a vertical,that’s not in tram) and bringing up the table. The reamer will actually bend and you will produce a larger tapered/out of square hole, all the time. It’s not much, but when you’re after accuracy, it will NOT be there. A simple way to check this is to put in a plug gage in the tailstock ,or a set up taper), lock it down, then run the indicator down the length of it for any lateral runout . Any deflection means you have tailstock runout on either YY or ZZ. There’s a lot to say about the reaming of any kind, but to produce a perfect chamber/ID that is right on the money, the whole set up has got to be right on the money too. “Olde” Timers and experience know all about this and will be bored. I hope I didn’t wander too much but if it helps someone, it’s all worth it. I’m sure many may disagree.
Thanx Tec
 
Lots of interesting information in this post. I have often thought we tend to be a little to fussey indicating everything to .0001" etc. Except for a few really old lathes I have never found a lathe spindle with more runout than the barrel bore as long as the spindle bearings were good. I lean towards rigid solid setups more so than the axial alignment of the tailstock that cannot be adjusted due to the spindle bore and tailstock bore not being axially aligned as the tailstock spindle strokes out. The biggest error I have seen is someone indicating the chamber end in to .0001" where some barrel maker reversed the lap. Or someone using a floating reamer holder and thinking a .5" long pilot on a reamer is going to keep things axially aligned at the back of the chamber. The point I'm making is my experience tells me you'll be hard pressed to find a barrel straighter and have less runout than most import lathe spindles. Tailstocks can have their alignment problems but nothing that cannot be easily corrected with shims.
 
One other thing you may consider is how the machine was set up.

When setting up a lathe you need a precision level like one from Starrett to properly indicate the ways and carriage along its entire travel as well as the cross slide so that its level along its entire range of motion.

If this is not accomplished any type of indicating you do as mentioned in the above post will be an exercise in futility as tapers, threads not being cut true, and all sorts of other gremlins will pop up causing problems.
 
Dave,
I must apologize for not covering any of the "basics." It's been about 55+ years since I set up any lathes or mills
 
I found the above intereting. I have done some metal work on lathes and am interested in buying one for my home shop for small projects. Could you recommend a small quality lathe that will not break the bank? The ones I used in the past were 1. something from 1906 with a leather belt and cast iron gears but very well made. 2. A 4' ENCO.,spelling??) Not sure how they compare to something more modern. I I remember correctly the Enco was about .002" off in the jaws of the chuck alone. I used to shim my work before I started. Anyway, some suggestions would be great.
thanks
 
Butch

Are you suggesting that a worn out lathe with a misaligned tailstock wouldnt hurt a chambering job.

wal
 
I haven't suggested anything yet. I just want a learned answer to my question. I would like someone to give me a good reason based on fact.Have you had your Vegimite this morning?
Butch
 
Butch

It depends on the quality of work and your expectations, and what tolerances you are chasing and whats exceptible to you?

Wal
 
Butch

I only work with quality lathes, materials, tooling, provided the right procedures are implemented your outcome is quality work with minimum to no tolerance.
Poor quality lathes make quality work hard to achieve as there is to many variables. As i said it all depends on the tolerances you are chasing, if your chasing tolerances of less than .002 TIR consistantly i would suggest buying a quality lathe less stress and heartache?
Why put a quality barrel with a poor chamber in a quality BAT or NESIKA action?

Wal
 
Wal,
I have worked in a machine shop for years in the past. I have an excellent Clausing lathe, but I have yet to hear from you why worn out ways and a misaligned tailstock affects a chambering job. Tell me what chambering operations are affected by them. I just want people to think a little bit. What are the ways doing while you are chambering? I am not advocating that you look for a worn out lathe. I just want an answer to my question. Why can't you hold .0001 in your chamber with worn out ways?
Butch
 
Butch
You need to tell me how you can hold .0001 TIR with a tailstock that is misaligned?
A floating reammer holder still wont compensate for a tailstock with more that .001 misalignment.

wal
 
Check your PMs Wal. As I stated in the PM, how many tailstocks are in TIR over its travel. Most have them at one point in the travel, but not through its travel. I doubt that you have any thing that will hold the reamer that well even if you have a correctly aligned tailstock. If you have preprepared your chamber properly before final reaming and use a properly designed pusher, you will have a straight chamber and is not oversized at the back.
Butch
 
wal said:
Butch
You need to tell me how you can hold .0001 TIR with a tailstock that is misaligned?
A floating reammer holder still wont compensate for a tailstock with more that .001 misalignment.

wal

With the method that I use,same as Butch), I'd bet a weeks pay that I can chamber a barrel to within .0001" TIR even if I offset my tailstock by .001". Heck, I bet I could offset it by quite a bit more than that and get a great chamber. If you do a search to see the method that I'm referring to, you may end up scratching your head thinking...why haven't I been doing it that way all along?
 
butchlambert said:
I haven't suggested anything yet. I just want a learned answer to my question. I would like someone to give me a good reason based on fact.Have you had your Vegimite this morning?
Butch

I can provide the answer. The answer is three parts - none, little, & a LOT!

None - depends on which item is worn and the affect on coencentricity of muzzle and chamber. 98% of ALL machinists do not have the measuring equipment capable of determining,measuring) this repeatedly.

Little & a LOT - if the tailstock and ways are worn/misaligned, the reamer and the bore do not share the same 3 dimensional plane. Therefore, you end up with a chamber that is not perpendicular and parallel to the bore.
 
Acloco,
What part do the ways play in a chambering operation. They are only used to cut the tenon and threading it. How much effect would .010 wear in the ways over 12" near the chuck? Remember it doesn't wear in and out. It drops the carriage. In other words the cutter is lower. But even at that how much will it affect a 1.115" tenon. Maybe .0005 as we are only concerned with the total movement of the carriage during turning and threading. You lock your carriage when cutting the shoulder. That is the important part. Your threads have to be loose enough to be able to seat against the shoulder. I believe you saw my explanation on the tailstock. Who has a drill chuck that is in perfect TIR to fit in your perfectly aligned tailstock?
I am going to bed.
Butch
 
Butch, With so many experts on lathes and chambering I would have thought the answer to come alot sooner. I guess I'll take a stab at it and assume the barrel bore is running true with the lathe axis.

A misaligned tailstock can cause the back end of the chamber to be cut a little large if you hold the reamer on the tailstock center. Compared to brass tolerances your really reaching for straws if you think it would be significant with a properly adjusted tailstock. I suspect one could misadjust the tailstock soo much the pilot would bind in the bore and the back end of the chamber would be enlarged a few thousands but I wouldn't want said person doing any work for me.

A floating reamer can eliminate tailstock adjustment error and aid in cutting a true diameter chamber. I have one from bald eagle precision as it was recommended to me by a famous engineer gunsmith but I no longer use it.
 
Sam you are correct. If you have headstock bearings with no runout and a properly designed pusher type reamer holder, you are good to go.
Butch
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,761
Messages
2,202,271
Members
79,089
Latest member
babysteel45
Back
Top