I ask this question every year with my F-Class league buddies, and it seems to be 50/50.
Back in the 90's, the 3 die sets (with a body size only die) were the rage, and you could body size/bump without touching the neck. Supposedly your neck would expand to conform your chamber. The same was true, vise versa for body sizing, you could neck size, and leave the body alone until you had tight bolt lift. But you could always feel a couple (or a few) bullets seat differently when not using the neck button...thus a "tight neck" that would give you an excuse for a bad shot. :'(
It seems to me that once I put mine back in...all my dies, all the neck tension problems went away. All my bullets seat like butter when using the correct bushing. But I still hears guys that don't use a bushing say, "I had a couple bullets seat hard". They say using the button overworks the brass... :
How many of you guys DO or DON'T use your neck expander buttons when sizing during case prep?
And what is your reason for doing it either way?
Back in the 90's, the 3 die sets (with a body size only die) were the rage, and you could body size/bump without touching the neck. Supposedly your neck would expand to conform your chamber. The same was true, vise versa for body sizing, you could neck size, and leave the body alone until you had tight bolt lift. But you could always feel a couple (or a few) bullets seat differently when not using the neck button...thus a "tight neck" that would give you an excuse for a bad shot. :'(
It seems to me that once I put mine back in...all my dies, all the neck tension problems went away. All my bullets seat like butter when using the correct bushing. But I still hears guys that don't use a bushing say, "I had a couple bullets seat hard". They say using the button overworks the brass... :

How many of you guys DO or DON'T use your neck expander buttons when sizing during case prep?
And what is your reason for doing it either way?