Did some searching and cat find much. So has anyone shortened the 6.5-284 to say 6.5-47 length? Thinking it would allow better seated 140s to magazine feed and get 2900+
Did some searching and cat find much. So has anyone shortened the 6.5-284 to say 6.5-47 length? Thinking it would allow better seated 140s to magazine feed and get 2900+
Remember when you shorten a case it turns into neck . The problem is the neck is thicker after . I have made plenty of 6mm Remington brass out 06 brass . LarryO.K., long hot search through a ton of older notes and case development projects but I found what I was looking for.
I initially shortened the case to be 1.800" in it's final form. I made one master die body and 3 different tops which I interchanged to gain the proper shoulder and body length. Obviously I had to fireform the cases then cleaned and trimmed to final length.
The net case capacity is 50.5 grains of water averaged between the 10 cases I finished. This is the case capacity of the .250 Savage Ackley Improved based on the notes.
My notes have a velocity range of 2850 - 2925 FPS based on using the Norma 130 VLD which I picked up from Norma at the SHOT Show that year, and which powder I tested. It's basically a 4350 case but I got the best performance from H-414 and VVN-550. This from a 26" Krieger barrel which was 4-groove.
The final iteration was a finished case with a length of 1.900" and case capacity of 53 grains of H2O which is similar to the 260 Rem. Here I could achieve 2950 fps. from the same 4350 powder slightly compressed but I could also push it up to approximately 3000 fps. with a hotter powder.
That's the basics!
Remember when you shorten a case it turns into neck . The problem is the neck is thicker after . I have made plenty of 6mm Remington brass out 06 brass . Larry
Having decided that the cartridge case has a bit too much powder capacity...
...he did some serious body reforming on the cartridge to shove the shoulders back enough to get to the 55AI case capacity. It worked, but he says the improvement was so marginal that it didn't justify the work.
That's about how many I have left,I was getting flashbacks from my stupid 338 case,and came to the same realization you did.Which is the same reasoning I used in my response.
We didn't have the Creedmoor cases or the 6.5x47L case for that matter 25 years ago.
That's why I still only have the same 10 original cases which I made to conduct the original experiment. The performance was as expected but there are other alternatives which require next to zero work to accomplish the same goals.
It was fun, I learned a lot but I got over it and moved on.
Regards.