• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Another Date With "Plain Jane"

jds holler

Gold $$ Contributor
Geez it's been tough to get out and do anymore load testing with my new rifle, but I have been able to slaughter quite a few squeaks with what's kind of become the standard load so far.

I had processed a hundred brass from my old 222 stock of Winchester. Unknown age or #s of reloads, and to judge their worthiness, I decapped them with my Lee universal decapper after sizing the necks down to 20 cal. The decapper rod measures .2035", and any cases that didn't show good tension were simply chucked.

I then stuffed them with 23 metered grains of BLC-2, and capped them with 32 gr. V-Max's, seated .010 shy of the lands.

I took 50 of these shells out last weekend and smithereened quite a few squirrels at a spot where 150 yards was about the limit of my shots. It was kinda like fish in a barrel. Then today, I took the other fifty out to check them on target with my state of the art bench rest set-up. :rolleyes:



Didn't expect too much from these fire-form shots, especially since the wind kicked up before I got started. It got to blowing the heat off the ground, creating HORRIBLE mirage, and my cross hairs were dancing around on the target like I had the DT's. For kicks, I left the barrel dirty after shooting the fifty some shots last weekend to see how it did.

Aaannnd -- here's my target.



Shot a couple warming shots before group #1, and it wasn't too bad. #s 2 and 3 were just peachy. Number 4 was opening up, but by that time the wind was getting pretty gnarley. I then decided to clean the barrel to see what kind of effect that might have. And you see numbers 5 and 6.

I used a pretty firm hold on the rifle today -- lots of face and shoulder. Groups printed pretty consistently, but I did adjust two clicks left after group #1.

I've got no idea of FPS on these loads, but they feel pretty mild, and show no signs of high pressure -- which is just fine with me. I'm thinking there is room to hit another accuracy node above this one. I don't think that groups in the .2's and .3's are too bad considering the questionable linage of this old brass.


I've got new bullets and powders too test, but it's damned hard for me to get out and do it. Work is cutting into my fun time, and when I get a little time it's hard not to simply take a box of these shells out and bust squirrels. jd
 
Wind and mirage is an enemy to me too! but I'm going to learn to read the wind as this year
it seems it's always bowing:mad:. Great write-up and good groups.... if it were me I would only clean yer rifle after a rat
busting session.;) I would try some 39 or 40 grainers sometime too.
 
Last edited:
Our wind this year has been off the charts. So much so that I'm just not even attempting much accuracy testing with this new rifle. I've got a box of Berger 40 gr. Varmints BT's that I've got high hopes for. They ought to be a little better for wind. Hells bells, we even had a tornado warning the other night, and this is Oregon for Gods sake.:eek: jd
 
JD...so glad to see this post. Almost missed it. I like it! I think the gun wants to shoot (and is) but the conditions are keeping you from nailing the load. BTW, I have a Swift that will simply not shoot inside a playing card until it has 8 rounds thru it. Then it punches the next 20 into little groups and then opens up again. Since i am not a volume shooter with it, I just half clean it when I get 25 on it, and it goes all summer that way...shoot 15 and 1/2 clean, shoot more.

Some girls like to run dirty
 
My next cleaning test is simply going to be to check it every now and then to see if I have to clean it at all. :p Dirty girls -- and rifles have always fit nicely into my game plan. :rolleyes: jd
 
JD...if you drill a 3/8 hole in each end of that "horse, below the table, add a long piece of 3/8 rod, you can hang spinner targets (mine are sillouhettes) with welded rod and a piece of black pipe atop each. Then turn your sawhorse sideways, and you have a hanging rack of spinner targets for rimfire. Here in the east I place a 4x4 foot square of mild steel behind it and I have a backer...out there I assume you could delete it. (A $200 option for sure)

(Call it your delux option and sell it for an additional $500 plus shipping and send me a bit o the profit eh?)
 
JD...if you drill a 3/8 hole in each end of that "horse, below the table, add a long piece of 3/8 rod, you can hang spinner targets (mine are sillouhettes) with welded rod and a piece of black pipe atop each. Then turn your sawhorse sideways, and you have a hanging rack of spinner targets for rimfire. Here in the east I place a 4x4 foot square of mild steel behind it and I have a backer...out there I assume you could delete it. (A $200 option for sure)

(Call it your delux option and sell it for an additional $500 plus shipping and send me a bit o the profit eh?)

I like the way you're thinkin. We at jd Industries are always interested in the "up-sale" potential of our products. You may have a future in our exciting future as a design consultant. :) jd
 
"Plain Jane" is kind of an unofficial name for the unofficial cartridge that this rifle is chambered for. -- .20-222, or "20 Plain Jane". Also the name of a pretty good Sammy Hagar song. jd

I was gonna say...aint nothin' Plain Jane about the rifle...I am liking it!!!!
 
I have a 788 and all the components but a barrel. I have a bunch of 222 brass and this is intriguing. Nice thread
 
I have a 788 and all the components but a barrel. I have a bunch of 222 brass and this is intriguing. Nice thread
That's kind of where I was -- had a m700 with a worn out barrel, and everything for loading 222. I've always preferred moderate powered stuff, and the .204 seemed a little much, soooo, I went this route.

I spent pretty good money for that barrel from PacNor, but after that, everything was cheap or free. That stock was a fifty dollar bill, shipped from Numrich, and I'm so tickled with it I can't hardly shut up. It fits my action so well that I just haven't worried about bedding or pillars, and I don't seem to be suffering from lack of em.

I started out with a hundred new Winchester brass, and have now started using my ancient 222's that have been loaded somewhere between two and twenty times.:rolleyes: They're all shooting good. I've only shot a couple groups as big as an inch, everything else has been closer to .5". I know this isn't that impressive for some of the shooters around here, but it's pretty good for me. I'd recommend this chambering for anyone who already loves a 222. jd
 
That's kind of where I was -- had a m700 with a worn out barrel, and everything for loading 222. I've always preferred moderate powered stuff, and the .204 seemed a little much, soooo, I went this route.

I spent pretty good money for that barrel from PacNor, but after that, everything was cheap or free. That stock was a fifty dollar bill, shipped from Numrich, and I'm so tickled with it I can't hardly shut up. It fits my action so well that I just haven't worried about bedding or pillars, and I don't seem to be suffering from lack of em.

I started out with a hundred new Winchester brass, and have now started using my ancient 222's that have been loaded somewhere between two and twenty times.:rolleyes: They're all shooting good. I've only shot a couple groups as big as an inch, everything else has been closer to .5". I know this isn't that impressive for some of the shooters around here, but it's pretty good for me. I'd recommend this chambering for anyone who already loves a 222. jd
I love 222s, just a fun, easy and accurate caliber. I have multiple neck dies that could be used for 20 cal. I have hundreds of pieces of brass. I like the low powered stuff too. I guess I better get started finding a reamer with zero freebore set up for a no neck turn.

I just used a mullerworks barrel for another 20 cal but I think I might try a Pacnor on this one. I don't think I would have any feeding problems out of the 788-222 magazine. I have pounders of H322, I would start there. What twist barrel do you have?
 
I got the 1/11 twist, and should be good to go on the 40 gr. bullets. So far all I've used are 32's.

I just run my necks through a 222 Redding FL Bushing Die with a .235 bushing, and then half the neck through a .226. Then expand them with a .203 mandrill.

The 222 case is just a real peach. I've never annealed a case in my life, and these things seem to last forever. If any feel that they don't have much tension when I hit them with the mandrill, I just toss them, but by this time they've probably been loaded 20 times.:rolleyes: jd
 
Here's the reamer print of my chamber from PacNor. I didn't ask for any modifications. I simply size a fired (or new) 222 case with a .235 bushing, and then hit half the neck with a .226. Then expand.

I think their .235 neck diameter leaves room for Lapua brass with no turning. jd

 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,927
Messages
2,206,430
Members
79,220
Latest member
Sccrcut8
Back
Top