First, since I am more of a reader and not a writer in this forum, thank you all for your contributions.
I have a theory I want to check with you, when I am seating the 7mm ELD-M 162 in a slightly compressed case with powder, the seating depth is within +/- 0.05 mm. This might not be a problem if the sweet spot was further from the lands. The bullets is measured are sorted base to oligve.
With the 7 mm Scenar 150 it’s within +/- 0.01mm with harder compressed loads add am beginning to think that it is the tip of the ELD that flexes where the seating stem touches’ the bullet (this bullet must be laser guided in my 708).
After measuring the total top to ogive the ES was 0.08 mm, doing that wound not give a significant improvement even though I think the tip would be more rigid
My solution is to bed the stem in order to enlarge the surface where the stem is touching the bullet.
What do you think, am I riding the bike in the wrong direction, what are your experience?
Looking forward for your response.
Regards Mats
I have a theory I want to check with you, when I am seating the 7mm ELD-M 162 in a slightly compressed case with powder, the seating depth is within +/- 0.05 mm. This might not be a problem if the sweet spot was further from the lands. The bullets is measured are sorted base to oligve.
With the 7 mm Scenar 150 it’s within +/- 0.01mm with harder compressed loads add am beginning to think that it is the tip of the ELD that flexes where the seating stem touches’ the bullet (this bullet must be laser guided in my 708).
After measuring the total top to ogive the ES was 0.08 mm, doing that wound not give a significant improvement even though I think the tip would be more rigid
My solution is to bed the stem in order to enlarge the surface where the stem is touching the bullet.
What do you think, am I riding the bike in the wrong direction, what are your experience?
Looking forward for your response.
Regards Mats









