Surely it's been done. That said, very similar cartridges like the 7mm IMSHA and others have been around for decades.I've found passing mention of it in a few places, but has anyone actually built and shot a 7 creedmoor?
And they were made for a specific purpose - the IHMSA is self explanatory. Theres nothing "wrong" with the 7-08, but it has been improved twice - the 7SLR, for a longer neck and the 7-08AI for increased capacity - it's good for F-Class BTW. Why you would need an underperforming 7mm....?Surely it's been done. That said, very similar cartridges like the 7mm IMSHA and others have been around for decades.
Thanks for that answer. What was the question?And they were made for a specific purpose - the IHMSA is self explanatory. Theres nothing "wrong" with the 7-08, but it has been improved twice - the 7SLR, for a longer neck and the 7-08AI for increased capacity - it's good for F-Class BTW. Why you would need an underperforming 7mm....?
I disagree with one exception. I will say if you can load each optimally 7-08 will always have higher velocities assuming similar brass quality. But unless you have an action/mag length that allows you to seat the bearing surface of the bullet entirely out of the case body the difference in case capacity is almost nothing. This is because making the case longer only pushes the bullet further into the case if your mag length is shorter than optimal load length. Comparing internal volume to internal volume of 6.5 creed and 260 rem from peterson for example we see 6.5 creed srp brass has 50.5 grains and 260 srp brass has 53 grains.Not enough case capacity to even come close to a 7/08
I looked at all the angles to wild cat it. Just was not worth
the effort.
You weren’t actually expecting germane answers, were ya?I've found passing mention of it in a few places, but has anyone actually built and shot a 7 creedmoor?
True but then you have significantly reduced mag capacity. Might as well get a mag bolt face and do 7 saum at that point.Then enter a 284 to the conversation and I think the 284 overshadows anything off of the 308 case or a 7 Creedmoor, even AI'd. Even loaded to short action mag length of 2.800 OAL and using a 180 Berger Hyb. a 284 has substantially more useable case capacity than any of those others.
I don't disagree with you on that at all. The others mentioned were all standard bolt face cartridges so I was trying to stay inline with that.True but then you have significantly reduced mag capacity. Might as well get a mag bolt face and do 7 saum at that point.
That's where us wildcatters get to play. I read your long post, andTrue but then you have significantly reduced mag capacity. Might as well get a mag bolt face and do 7 saum at that point.
They are all 35 degree like the parent case. On the SA284, I have@Fuj, what's the shoulder angle of your ELF and SA case?
How much powder do you run in them?
From what i've found, magazine capacity hasn't changed by chambering to 284 Win from 7mm-08.True but then you have significantly reduced mag capacity. Might as well get a mag bolt face and do 7 saum at that point.
Most of the guys I know are in the 2900 fps range with Berger 180'sSo your SA 284 is pushing a 183g bullet as fast as the parent case.
I recall a fair amount of conversation on Snipers Hide with Mark at SAC working on it.I've found passing mention of it in a few places, but has anyone actually built and shot a 7 creedmoor?