I've got all the parts pretty well done and here for a new 600 and 1000 yd F-class rifle. Richard Franklin's Lowrider stock, Lawton Machine 7500 dual port action, .473 boltface Jewell trugger. And a Satern 5C cut rifled barrel, 1 in 8 twist .243 cal to finish at 28".
I've read enough on here to make my head spin. Thank's for a great website.
What's wrong with the plain ol 243 winchester??? If I take good care of the barrel it should run a long time. I already have a .243 28" 1 in 8 tube for a Savage rifle I shoot. And have Redding/Forster bushing dies, and micrometer seater. The Savage gets shot a lot, practice, practice and shoot it some more. This new rifle is kind of reserved for matches, so barrel life isn't the biggest concern.
Will a 6X47 be a better choice for the application? Will barrel life really be that much more? Are there any "alleged" accuracy gains from one chambering to the other? I like to keep things SIMPLE, not fireforming and working brass, just load and shoot, and I really don't need to spend a wad of cash on different brass and dies, but if there is something verry wrong with the 243, then 6X47 it is.
Thank's
I've read enough on here to make my head spin. Thank's for a great website.
What's wrong with the plain ol 243 winchester??? If I take good care of the barrel it should run a long time. I already have a .243 28" 1 in 8 tube for a Savage rifle I shoot. And have Redding/Forster bushing dies, and micrometer seater. The Savage gets shot a lot, practice, practice and shoot it some more. This new rifle is kind of reserved for matches, so barrel life isn't the biggest concern.
Will a 6X47 be a better choice for the application? Will barrel life really be that much more? Are there any "alleged" accuracy gains from one chambering to the other? I like to keep things SIMPLE, not fireforming and working brass, just load and shoot, and I really don't need to spend a wad of cash on different brass and dies, but if there is something verry wrong with the 243, then 6X47 it is.
Thank's