7x57 said:
I suppose you could, but if you're going with a single shot bench gun with that bolt head, why would you not do a 6ppc? Probably the main advantage of the 6AR over the PPC is that it is made to feed from a magazine, on the other hand, the PPC has dominated short range BR forever. No reason why you couldn't do it, but you'd likely lose to a PPC in that game.
GSPV said:
Yep. Just neck down 6.5 Grendel and go shoot.
The 6 AR is a 70 thou long 6 PPC. That's the problem. The PPC capacity is perfect for the mid 60 gr benchrest bullets at the right velocity.
If anything, the PPC might be a little too much. I know a guy that shoots a 6 Tyger that is a short PPC. He shoots a different powder and is very competitive. And his barrels last longer.
Now, if you jumped up to a heavier bullet and a faster twist, found the right powder, maybe 8208XBR, H4895, or Varget, perhaps you would find another winning combination. At 10.5 lbs, the recoil might be an issue. Maybe not as Mike Stinnett does it with a 30 Stewart. There are people shooting 6 BRs that way in UBR where all the guns are 13.5 lbs and the 30 cal has no "bigger hole" advantage.
Just my $0.02.
I'm not sure that it has been proven, that the 6PPC is the end all, be all of benchrest accuracy. It certainly is GREAT, but has a cottage industry built around it and 99+% of group shooters shoot it. The mere fact that everyone shoots it, in and of itself, speaks to it's domination of group shooting, today, and the industry supporting it and information related to it, certainly support it in dominating group shooting.
But what if we had the same cottage industry and support around the cartridge widely called a 6mmAR? What if we had great benchrest quality bullets from every supplier in the 70-80 grain range, to optimize the case's capacity in the way the mid 60 grain bullets do for the ppc capacity? How about powders?
Both cases have a lot going for them. Both have great brass with small primers and small flash holes. There are currently some very good 80 grain bullets available, now. We may well find a powder that is currently available to be as good or better than the 133/ppc combo for it...
Maybe it would prove to be a tad too overbore, so what if a 6.5 Grendel had the same support and components?
Personally, I think if someone pursued the 6mm AR enough, that the difference between it and the ppc would come down to bullets, barrels, and trigger nuts.
There doesn't seem to be room left for "earth shattering" improvements in accuracy, when we look at what the guns we have now, are capable of. Convincing 99% of shooters and the ppc cottage industry to change won't be easy. The good thing about that is, you don't have to...Just build it and shoot it. There are pro's and con's to both, but there is a sizable segment of the 30BR crowd, that believes it to be superior to the ppc in terms in inherent accuracy. One could argue for either case.
You don't see many ppc's winning in the IBS or NBRSA score game, and you don't see many 30's winning in group, but one has to wonder how that might look if there were pretty equal numbers of different calibers and cartridges, shooting side by side....
Go look at the UBR
http://ultimatebenchrest.com/ website. That's where you can see just that. The mix AND results are remarkably even.
Food for thought....
Mike Ezell