It’s just an arbitrary number, so what I measure with my equipment would more than likely be different than your numbers from your equipment. Every bullet is going to be different even different lots of the same make can be different.Curious if anyone has measurements (or has done a comparison) of base-to-ogive lengths for 6 mm target bullets, greater than 95 gr? Not interested in lighter-weight projectiles. Thanks!
It’s just an arbitrary number, so what I measure with my equipment would more than likely be different than your numbers from your equipment. Every bullet is going to be different even different lots of the same make can be different.
Wayne
If you provide me the comparator I’ll measure all of the 6mm bullets I have on hand.Curious if anyone has measurements (or has done a comparison) of base-to-ogive lengths for 6 mm target bullets, greater than 95 gr? Not interested in lighter-weight projectiles. Thanks!
Sorry for the confusion...my fault. I'm looking to seat 6 mm bullets > 95 gr weight about .010" to 0.015" back of the rifling (it's a 6x45 AR target rifle), minimizing the distance that the bullet extends into the case. I agree the actual number is not consistent, but I was curious if anyone could rank some bullets, say, relative to the 95 gr Berger and 107 SMK as references (which I have on hand).Not sure what your asking.
Are you wanting to know what bullets have a more consistent BTO?
Or just BTO's for 95 grain + bullets from different companies for comparison?
And for what reason?
Yes, and thanks for the suggestion. I'm hoping someone else may have done similar and had that info. across a range of bullets.Are you looking to maximize case volume with the bullet at .010" off the lands? Maybe the easier thing to do is fit sample bullets into the muzzle end of a barrel and see which bullets protrude the least.
Would that be the bore or the bottom of lands ?I took my 6BRA barrel, which has a recessed flat crown, and measured from the recess surface to the base of various bullets.
Bart's Infinity 105: .614"
Ammerman 103: .650
Vapor Trail (hand pulled) lot v2074: .607
Vapor Trail VT-TAC lot 3817: .614
Roy Hunter 106: .632
Roy Hunter 103 (made by Wheeler) .633
Berger VLD Target 105 .638
Berger BT Target 90 .530
It's the muzzle end, a flat square crown. It isn't tapered like the lands but it is consistent and touches the bullet at basically the same diameter as the lands (which a Hornady comparator does not)Would that be the bore or the bottom of lands ?
If I’m understanding you, the measurement is taken off the bottom of the lands ( .243) rather than the bore, which in mine is .237It's the muzzle end, a flat square crown. It isn't tapered like the lands but it is consistent and touches the bullet at basically the same diameter as the lands (which a Hornady comparator does not)
It should be the bore. This is a Bartlein and I think all of their are .237 bore.If I’m understanding you, the measurement is taken off the bottom of the lands ( .243) rather than the bore, which in mine is .237
I have Berger 90 gr Target bullets as well...so I can make a similar measurement for comparison. I also have 105 Lapua, 95 Berger, and 107 SMK.I took my 6BRA barrel, which has a recessed flat crown, and measured from the recess surface to the base of various bullets.
Bart's Infinity 105: .614"
Ammerman 103: .650
Vapor Trail (hand pulled) lot v2074: .607
Vapor Trail VT-TAC lot 3817: .614
Roy Hunter 106: .632
Roy Hunter 103 (made by Wheeler) .633
Berger VLD Target 105 .638
Berger BT Target 90 .530