• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

6mm ARC - Practical Reloading

Wanted to learn about what others are trying and share my experience so far:


Build:
  • 20” 1:7 twist 416 SS DMR Profile Ballistic Advantage barrel
  • Vltor upper and lower
  • Ballistic Advantage bolt in PSA premium bolt carrier
  • Adjustable gas block
  • TBAC Ultra-9 suppressor
  • Geissele SSA-E trigger



Goal:
It would be fun to have a relatively light weight AR-15 platformed rifle that can consistently shoot at or under .5 MOA from 100 to 1000 yards.

Testing:
From prone using Joy-Pod bipod, Bigfoot rear bag and NF 5.5-22X50 optic. All rounds loaded to 2.26 COAL.

First steps:
Using the lathe, I modified some 6.5 Grendel dies by shaving off .040 from the base and replacing the neck sizing bushing. I set the dies up in a Forster Coax press and using annealed 6.5 Grendel brass, sized the necks down and pushed the shoulders back to the SAAMI specs. I also used a Sinclair carbide expander mandrel before loading.

First firing:
I was lazy, and using known data from the 6mm AR, I loaded 27.5 grains of H4895 under a 105 Berger Hybrid Target. This was way over pressure yielding speeds in the 2730 FPS range, heavy ejector swipes and unusably expanded primer pockets. Groups were all in the 1 to 1.5 MOA range at 100 yards. SDs were in the low single digits, however! Bad test - bad approach and dangerous. I know better and am lucky to re-learn that lesson without the pain that often accompanies such learnings.

Second firing:
Testing from 26.0 grains of H4895 up to 26.5 grains showed better results. The best results were the 26.5 grain charges with speeds of 2594 but SDs in the 17 FPS range. 100 yard groups were in the mid .5 MOA range. The groups got worse as the the powder charge decreased. No pressure signs, swipes or ejector marks at this charge range. It is, however, over pressure according to Quickload.

Changing gears:
I received some Hornady 105 grain Black factory ammunition that shot poorly in my barrel. Speed was good at 2640 FPS and SDs were a reasonable 11.4 FPS. Group sizes at 100 yards were terrible at 1.9 MOA.

I also tried some VARGET under the Hornady 108 ELD-M. 27 grains yielded 2554 FPS with a 5.5 SD and very repeatable .5 - .52 MOA at 100. I took these out to 700 and 900 yards on a windless day with the same .4 to .5 MOA results. The lack of wind is unusual but was welcomed. There were no pressure signs at this charge weight, however, Quickload estimates that this is 3900 PSI over SAAMI pressure.

Learning so far:
Fired by not resized converted 6.5 Grendel brass holds 34.74 grains of water and fired but not resized factory 6mm ARC cases holds 34.58 grains of water. In Quickload I edited a 6 PPC case for case length and case capacity and now get estimated MV within 2-4 FPS of what I have measured using the Labradar.

Disclaimer:
All of the above hand loads are above 52000 PSI, and, as such, I am obligated to warn everyone from trying them. If you do so, you are doing it at your own risk.

Next Steps:
It looks like the 27 grain VARGET and 108 ELD-M combo is very close to a predicted OBT node. .2 to .3 more grains is what I am going to test next.

Additionally, I don’t want to give up on H4895. I want to test this powder with both the 108 ELD-M and the 105 Hybrid Target.
  • Will try 26.6 H4895 with 108 ELD-M expecting 2608 FPS out of my barrel.
  • Will also try 26.5 H4895 with 105 Hybrid Target expecting 2635 FPS out of my barrel.
Both of the above correspond to OBT nodes using Quickload.

Request:
There is already a big thread in progress discussing the merits of this cartridge which is interesting but not the intent of this one. Would like to keep this thread focused on practical experience and suggestions to optimize safe hand loads for this cartridge in semi-auto gas rifles.

Hope this helps someone,

Henryrifle
 
Are you planning on duplicating 52,000 PSI loads with various powders?

First, my interest with this rifle/cartridge is just for fun and my 'fun' goal is being able to shoot steel out to 1000 yards using magazine length and magazine fed ammunition. I'd like to be able to do that with components that I already have and use minimizing purchases of specialized components. As such, I'd like to achieve the goals above using Berger's 105 Hybrid Target and/or Hornady's 108 ELD-M.

Without a way to measure actual chamber pressure I rely on Quickload, experience and examination and measurement of fired brass to inform my powder charge decisions. I may be personally willing to exceed the spec by 10% (as estimated by Quickload). If it takes more than that to achieve the goal then, I'll look first at other powders, then projectiles, then consider a longer barrel or, more likely, abandon the project.

6mm ARC is just a fun project to me. I enjoy the journey of these kinds of things. I shoot F-T/R competitively and am not looking to 6mm ARC to solve a problem or fill a need. There is a lot of joy in F-T/R but, for me, the fun is in the result. My F-T/R journey now is about practice, precision in loading, rifle handling and preparation. I tried the 6.5 Grendel years ago for the same reasons I am playing with 6mm ARC today and after shooting about 200 rounds, I set it aside as it did not meet those goals. I realized that all I needed was a barrel to convert the Grendel and, I jumped at the chance.

Just curious what others are doing with the cartridge and how they are loading for it and their results as well as sharing my experience so far.

Henryrifle
 
I appreciate you sharing the results and look forward to seeing more updates.

If you are able and don't mind, it'd be neat to see a picture of a loaded round and a bullet next to it to show how far the bullet sits in the neck when you've got it loaded to fit the magazine. I'm pretty curious if they had to push the bullet back in the case a little to make it all fit and if a bolt gun with an appropriately longer freebore might gain a little capacity back.
 
First, my interest with this rifle/cartridge is just for fun and my 'fun' goal is being able to shoot steel out to 1000 yards using magazine length and magazine fed ammunition. I'd like to be able to do that with components that I already have and use minimizing purchases of specialized components. As such, I'd like to achieve the goals above using Berger's 105 Hybrid Target and/or Hornady's 108 ELD-M.

Without a way to measure actual chamber pressure I rely on Quickload, experience and examination and measurement of fired brass to inform my powder charge decisions. I may be personally willing to exceed the spec by 10% (as estimated by Quickload). If it takes more than that to achieve the goal then, I'll look first at other powders, then projectiles, then consider a longer barrel or, more likely, abandon the project.

6mm ARC is just a fun project to me. I enjoy the journey of these kinds of things. I shoot F-T/R competitively and am not looking to 6mm ARC to solve a problem or fill a need. There is a lot of joy in F-T/R but, for me, the fun is in the result. My F-T/R journey now is about practice, precision in loading, rifle handling and preparation. I tried the 6.5 Grendel years ago for the same reasons I am playing with 6mm ARC today and after shooting about 200 rounds, I set it aside as it did not meet those goals. I realized that all I needed was a barrel to convert the Grendel and, I jumped at the chance.

Just curious what others are doing with the cartridge and how they are loading for it and their results as well as sharing my experience so far.

Henryrifle
Thanks for the reply I'm planning on a 2 upper rifle.
 
Thank you, Gtscotty, for posting that link. Have been interested to see what they would publish.

I edited this because those speeds are a little slow compared to my experience in a 20" barrel. Maybe all speeds are given for the slower of the two projectiles. Quickload is still showing that those max loads are a little over 52000 PSI, several showing 54000 PSI. My settings match my measured results but could be the difference in barrel speed.

Henryrifle
 
Last edited:
Hornady posted some data for 108gr/110gr bullets on their site. The velocities for temp in-sensitive powders are disappointing, with sensitive powders like LVR and CFE 223 giving >150fps higher velocity.

https://www.hornady.com/assets/site/hornady/files/load-data/6mm-arc.pdf
By temperature sensitive what extreme do you mean? The 30 Carbine was reported to lose 600 FPS in the winters of Korea. Have you experienced 5%, 10%?

I always work my loads in hot conditions so I can control pressures but a 10% loss in cold conditions would be objectionable.
 
By temperature sensitive what extreme do you mean? The 30 Carbine was reported to lose 600 FPS in the winters of Korea. Have you experienced 5%, 10%?

I always work my loads in hot conditions so I can control pressures but a 10% loss in cold conditions would be objectionable.

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking, if you're asking what temp extremes I shoot in, I guess in the last 6 months I've been shooting at the long range in temperatures between -2 F and 85 F. I only really use powders designed to be relatively temp stable like the Hodgdon extreme line, IMR Enduron line and the newer Alliant RL16, RL23 and AR-Comp powders. All of the LR shooters I talk to here and in Northern Colorado seem to use similar powders with the intent to minimize vertical over potentially widely varying shooting temps, and to minimize the chance of getting kicked out of a node due to temp related velocity change. That said, PRS type shooting is the game here and I don't really know any benchrest types or what they use.

The velocity variance related to temperature change isn't really usually discussed in percentage, but more fps/deg. I don't use ball powders (except some 6.5 Staball of late) but from reports and "testing" you can find on the internet it looks like some of the less stable ball powders can vary ~2 fps/deg, where as some of the most stable extruded powders can be in the ~0.2 fps/deg range. Apparently the variance is very dependent on cartridge and load pressure though, so it's hard to find real solid general numbers.

At any rate, it's an extra unneeded shooting variable I'd like to minimize (Wyoming wind keeps me plenty busy), so I always use more temp stable powders, even though they almost never give the top velocities.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking, if you're asking what temp extremes I shoot in, I guess in the last 6 months I've been shooting at the long range in temperatures between -2 F and 85 F. I only really use powders designed to be relatively temp stable like the Hodgdon extreme line, IMR Enduron line and the newer Alliant RL16, RL23 and AR-Comp powders. All of the LR shooters I talk to here and in Northern Colorado seem to use similar powders with the intent to minimize vertical over potentially widely varying shooting temps, and to minimize the chance of getting kicked out of a node due to temp related velocity change. That said, PRS type shooting is the game here and I don't really know any benchrest types or what they use.

The velocity variance related to temperature change isn't really usually discussed in percentage, but more fps/deg. I don't use ball powders (except some 6.5 Staball of late) but from reports and "testing" you can find on the internet it looks like some of the less stable ball powders can vary ~2 fps/deg, where as some of the most stable extruded powders can be in the ~0.2 fps/deg range. Apparently the variance is very dependent on cartridge and load pressure though, so it's hard to find real solid general numbers.

At any rate, it's an extra unneeded shooting variable I'd like to minimize (Wyoming wind keeps me plenty busy), so I always use more temp stable powders, even though they almost never give the top velocities.

Thanks for the reply, I've been concerned about pressure with sensitive powders so I always work loads in warm conditions and expose tests loads to direct sun.

I view the new 6MM ARC AR rifle/cartridge as a working gas gun like the 5.56 NATO cartridge in my AR 15 A2. The FPS spread you're discussing is relevant but less so for practical field applications, hunting CQC.
 
I like AR-Comp in my Grendel pushing the Hornady 123gr Amax if you can find NOS. Similar accuracy with the 123gr ELD-M. AR-Comp is the most temp stable powder I have ever used.

Alliant Web Page said:
AR-Comp Offers Uniform Velocities over a Wide Temp Range
Tests were done with .223 Rem and .308 Win ammo, loaded with AR-Comp and maintained at temps from -20° F to +160° F in a controlled test center. The ammo itself was heated or cooled to targeted temps before testing. Across that entire range of temperature, -20° F to +160° F, the ammo loaded with AR-Comp showed a variation of only 20 fps in muzzle velocity.

Hoot
 
I like AR-Comp in my Grendel pushing the Hornady 123gr Amax if you can find NOS. Similar accuracy with the 123gr ELD-M. AR-Comp is the most temp stable powder I have ever used.



Hoot
+1 for AR-Comp. If I were going 6 ARC it would be the first powder I'd try. 8208 would be the second, although 8208 is a lot more temp sensitive it's just super accurate and clean.
 
I like AR-Comp in my Grendel pushing the Hornady 123gr Amax if you can find NOS. Similar accuracy with the 123gr ELD-M. AR-Comp is the most temp stable powder I have ever used.
Hoot

I agree, I've had good luck with AR-Comp in .308s and my Grendel. I was a bit surprised that it didn't show up in Hornady's first bit of ARC load data. I know it's nit-picky, but the way Hornady does load data has always bothered me. Velocities are usually in 100 fps or 50 fps general increments, and while in this instance, only two bullets were grouped together, sometimes it's up to 10 different bullets with varying construction all grouped together under the same load data. I'm sure they have their reasons, and everyone should work up their own loads, but it just seems a bit..... half-assed.

It's good to see some load data getting out, but I'm looking forward to seeing what the sources that I tend to use more like Hodgdon, Alliant and Sierra come up with.
 
Gtscotty, I agree. I’ll add that Speer and Nosler data have also been quite excellent in recent years and both are free online.
 
I tried the 6.5 Grendel years ago for the same reasons I am playing with 6mm ARC today and after shooting about 200 rounds, I set it aside as it did not meet those goals. I realized that all I needed was a barrel to convert the Grendel and, I jumped at the chance.







Henryrifle

That's exactly where I'm at...my 24" Grendel will soon be a 24" 6mm ARC as soon as the barrel gets here.

Has anyone tried Benchmark? My Grendels really like it! Be nice to use it in my 6mm ARC as well...its easy to find where I'm at and less expensive.

Tomorrow I'm going to anneal some cases neck them down to prepare to load some to fire form once the barrel arrives. I have some 20yo 6mm bullets that I will be using to fire form my cases with.
 
I agree, I've had good luck with AR-Comp in .308s and my Grendel. I was a bit surprised that it didn't show up in Hornady's first bit of ARC load data. I know it's nit-picky, but the way Hornady does load data has always bothered me. Velocities are usually in 100 fps or 50 fps general increments, and while in this instance, only two bullets were grouped together, sometimes it's up to 10 different bullets with varying construction all grouped together under the same load data. I'm sure they have their reasons, and everyone should work up their own loads, but it just seems a bit..... half-assed.

It's good to see some load data getting out, but I'm looking forward to seeing what the sources that I tend to use more like Hodgdon, Alliant and Sierra come up with.
Just as you mention AR-Comp works in both 308 and 6.5 Grendel. I use Benchmark in 308 and 6.5 Grendel.

I never used AR-Comp in anything but I can't recall see it on the self at the stores I buy reloading components.

Benchmark on the other hand I see all the time that's why I tried it in 308 originally.

Of course the shelves are bare now. I hit my three favorite shops yesterday and only found Black Powder on the shelf. I hated to do but I paid the hazmat fees and let a big mail order, order rip!
 
I put 70 more test rounds down the barrel today and have a total of 180 rounds through the barrel. It looks like it has picked up about 40 FPS on factory Black 105 gr BTHP ammo. Were it was shooting at 2640 FPS with and SD of 11.4 it is now shooting at 2684 FPS with an SD of 12.8 as measured by a Labradar. Temperatures between the two days are similar at 84 and 88 degrees F. I want to comment on this speed later.

Similarly, my 108 ELD-M over Varget has sped up as well. At 27 grains it was shooting at 2554 FPS with an SD of 5.5 and, today 27.1 grains of the same lot under the same projectile is now shooting 2591 FPS with an SD of 18. I would have expected a 5-7 FPS increase from the extra 1/10th grain but not 37 FPS. I am sure that my SDs will settle down now that all of the brass has been fired and sized by the same die. I have switched from my converted Grendel dies to Hornady dies.

The best groups are still in the .5s out of the 20” Ballistic advantage barrel but interestingly, it seems to like the velocity to be around 2550 FPS. With Varget and 108 ELD-Ms that is now in the 26.8 grain range and with H4895 it is in the 26.0 grain range. This velocity will be in the transonic speed range just after 900 yards.

Factory Black 105 HPBT are still shooting in the 1.9 MOA range but, what’s interesting is that there are no pressure signs at 2684 FPS on the brass. No ejector flow or swipes. Unfortunately, I am getting mild ejector flow from my loads even though they are 80 to 100 FPS slower. H4895 is worse than the Varget loads. That is okay for now as the Varget loads are the more accurate loads.

The powders that yield the highest velocities Hornady lists in their newly published load data, thank you, Gtscotty, are CFE-223 and LeverEvolution. Probably worth a try with either of those to see if I can find an accurate speed without the obvious pressure. Both are significantly slower than H4895 and even Varget.

As my speeds approached 2600 FPS and surpassed that velocity, groups opened up into the .9s and 1.1s. Not where I want to be. I don’t want to go faster with either powder I am currently using.

Will retest both Hornady 108 ELD-M and Berger 105 Hybrid Target with Varget (26.8 gas.) and H4895 (26.0 gas.) below and just above 2550 FPS to validate data collected so far.

Quickload is still showing both of these loads as higher pressure than 52,000 PSI and as such should only be used at your own risk.

More to come…
 
Henryrifle, I’d take a look at CFE 223.

Now,

It looks like crappy pull-down milsurp cold war powder, and it leaves filth on your muzzle & brake.

But it’s absolutely the most precise powder I’ve found for 223 Wylde 77 SMK load in my 1:7 and 53 Vmax in my 223 1:12. It’s bizarre how superior it performs compared to 7 or 8 others I tried to no avail.

It also does actually do its copper eliminating thing.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,888
Messages
2,186,213
Members
78,579
Latest member
Gunman300
Back
Top