The 130gn Berger VLD, AR-Hybrid Tactical, and 140gn Target Hybrid have identical Litz derived and tested 'form factors' (ie the drag they produce against the G7 'reference projectile'). The trio are rated as 0.922-0.924 which given the test regime's accuracy means there's nothing much if at all between them and that they produce 7-8% less drag than the G7 reference (form factor = 1.000).
In such a case where two bullets with different weights have identical form factor values (but different BCs as weight/calibre determine SD, the other component of BC) if loaded to equivalent MVs (those that produce identical ME values), the heavier bullet has a higher trajectory, but less wind drift. So as a purely F-Class type tool, the 140 Hybrid would be a slightly better choice all other things being equal. The all other things being equal caveat is the rub of course as it covers non external ballistics issues such as precision, recoil, whether the load stays in tune over long periods and different weather conditions. MV too might vary from equivalent levels according to the pressure / load that gives smallest groups and/or ES/SD values.
Taking the 130gn AR-Hybrid against an existing 140gn Hybrid load that shoots very well at say 2,850 fps MV.
140gn @ 2,850 = 2,525 ft/lb ME
130gn @ 2,957 = 2,524 ft/lb ME ('equivalent' loading)
At 1,000 yards, Berger's ballistic calculator gives the pair the following results
130 / 2,957 fps .................................. 1,523 fps / 7.1 inches per 1 mph crosswind change
140 / 2,850 fps .................................. 1,539 fps / 6.76 inches per 1 mph crosswind change
So in any give wind change, the 130 will move around a third of an inch more per single mph wind when corrected to a 90-degree equivalent.