• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

260 Rem powder choices

Helping a friend build a 260 for long range hunting school and future hunting trip. We put on a 24" CBI 1:8 twist barrel. He has chosen 140 Berger Hunting VLDs and has several boxes. We found a good supply of 260 Lapua brass. I have tons of primers to share. Redding S-type FL dies with the competition seater are in hand.

Now the hard part.... since H-4350 is unobtainable (in my searching efforts recently) what powder would guys suggest we try? Keep in my that he has a 24" barrel - which is a sub-nose by my definition. For a hunting load we are wanting to have near a max velocity with a given powder. I have or can get the following:

IMR-4350
RE-15
RE-17
RE-19
IMR-4064
H-4831SC

What would you suggest. Once we work up a load, he wants to go to his long range shooting school with 250 rounds pre-loaded. I am a bit concerned about the elevation swing. We are at 800 ft and his shooting school is +7,000 ft.

Thanks for any help, Tim
 
140gr VLDs...well, H4350 is usually the preferred powder, followed by 4831SC.

Some guys are using RE-17. Stick with H4350.

The 24" barrel is not an issue, even out to 1000 yards.

For elevation swings like that, I would try not to be at max for the rifle. My suggestion, is to try to find a powder range that shoots well, say for example 43.2-43.5 gr. Then, I would most likely shoot the low end of the node, so in this example, 43.2gr. That way you have some room in case temperature or elevation does affect the load.
 
I would use H4831SC. I have a 24" CBI 1-8 twist 260 barrel, and my combo is 140's, Lapua brass, Wolf LR primer, with H4831SC powder. I get 2800 avg. speed with 46.5grs and super low ES/SD's.
 
38.5gr of N150 with 123s or 142s works in 4 different 260 rifles I know of. But of the powders you listed I also run H4831SC in my space gun with 142s and it shoots well. Both 4350's are blow torches to the throats and I try to stay away from them unless it clearly is the better powder such as in my .30-40's and the -06's.
 
46.5 of 4831sc w/140 vld or 140 amax@ 2860 fps. 26" Douglas Barrel on long action. Just touching lands. Not hot but warm load.
 
If you have Re-17 on hand, you may want to give it a whirl. I've had excellent results - very good accuracy and velocity - with this powder in the the standard .260 and with the lighter bullets in the .260 AI.
 
I've had decent luck with RL 17. A lot of guys were shooting the IMR 4350 with good luck also when H4350 disappeared. H4350 has been showing up at Powder Valley and different outlets on a regular basis but it is a blow torch on throats. After 1100 rounds mine looks worse than a .308 I had with over twice the round count.
 
loneranger04 said:
I've had decent luck with RL 17. A lot of guys were shooting the IMR 4350 with good luck also when H4350 disappeared. H4350 has been showing up at Powder Valley and different outlets on a regular basis but it is a blow torch on throats. After 1100 rounds mine looks worse than a .308 I had with over twice the round count.
Looking at QL H4350 get 95% of velocity is 18'' of the barrel.
RL 17 only takes 9 1/2'' for 95 %. I would think you would be less likely to burn a barrel with the pressures and heat over a longer barrel area . Larry
 
savagedasher said:
loneranger04 said:
I've had decent luck with RL 17. A lot of guys were shooting the IMR 4350 with good luck also when H4350 disappeared. H4350 has been showing up at Powder Valley and different outlets on a regular basis but it is a blow torch on throats. After 1100 rounds mine looks worse than a .308 I had with over twice the round count.
Looking at QL H4350 get 95% of velocity is 18'' of the barrel.
RL 17 only takes 9 1/2'' for 95 %. I would think you would be less likely to burn a barrel with the pressures and heat over a longer barrel area . Larry

If one were to put the QL data into practical context, a 10" Encore .260 pistol barrel would be nipping at the heels of a 28" tube on an F Class rifle in terms of velocity. I'm having a very, very hard time with that . . .

I'm sure you read it right, but I'm thinking someone's function has a problem with exponentiation.
 
how about imr 4451

supposed to be about the same burn rate as H4350 and insensitive to temperature too.

I tried it in my 243 and it showed some promise to continue to work up some loads
 
My best results in order
H4350
H4831sc

These are for the 140/142 class bullets.

I believe RL17, based on my experience with 6.5 Creedmoor, may be the best for velocity but not as temp stable as the two above.
 
JLT said:
savagedasher said:
loneranger04 said:
I've had decent luck with RL 17. A lot of guys were shooting the IMR 4350 with good luck also when H4350 disappeared. H4350 has been showing up at Powder Valley and different outlets on a regular basis but it is a blow torch on throats. After 1100 rounds mine looks worse than a .308 I had with over twice the round count.
Looking at QL H4350 get 95% of velocity is 18'' of the barrel.
RL 17 only takes 9 1/2'' for 95 %. I would think you would be less likely to burn a barrel with the pressures and heat over a longer barrel area . Larry
[/quote
If one were to put the QL data into practical context, a 10" Encore .260 pistol barrel would be nipping at the heels of a 28" tube on an F Class rifle in terms of velocity. I'm having a very, very hard time with that . . .

I'm sure you read it right, but I'm thinking someone's function has a problem with exponentiation.
using QL and H4350 130 gr bullet 2.800as a base line here is the results
28'' barrel amount of powder burnt 98.15 % speed 2648 10'' barrel 86.81%with 2135 FPS
Larry
 
using QL and H4350 130 gr bullet 2.800as a base line here is the results
28'' barrel amount of powder burnt 98.15 % speed 2648 10'' barrel 86.81%with 2135 FPS
Larry


Sorry for being less than clear. I was referring to the RL-17 output. I don't believe that 95% velocity is achieved in less than 10" of barrel with a 6.5mm bore with RL-17. If that were so, one would notice a significant difference in felt recoil, all other things being equal (velocity and bullet mass). F=m*a . . .
 
H4350. H4831SC is a touch too slow, you will get good accuracy but poor velocity (I found it hard to get over 2800fps with a 140gn bullet without packing the case). RL-17 works too, but when I tried it, I needed massive bullet jump (0.070"!) for good accuracy and even then H4350 was more accurate.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,893
Messages
2,205,614
Members
79,196
Latest member
pkitrinos01
Back
Top