Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here are my thoughts on the subject. You can, for all intents and purposes, run ALMOST right with a 6.5 x 284 using 140 class bullets out of the .260A.I. AND Palma brass. You will be pushing it hard >> BUT that brass can take it. Now, there is no "free lunch" as the adage goes, and that is true. If you run the .260A.I. with palma brass and run it hard, you WILL burn barrels out just as quickly as you would with a "straight" 6.5 x .284.. SO WHY do that? I am getting my 2nd .260A.I. barrel ready for chambering and will, once again, use "regular" .260 brass (L/R Primers).. The reason is, is I want to get to 2900 f.p.s. with 140 class bullets without PUSHING it to it's limits. That will increase my barrel life significantly and NOT make a lot of difference down-range.. If I want to push 3000 f.p.s. with 140 class bullets, I would simply go for a regular 6.5 x 284>>>fabulously accurate, with very little recoil. These are my thoughts after having 2 / 6.5 x .284's and now on chambering my 2nd .260A.I.Do any of you 260 Remington shooters use necked down 308 Palma brass? If so, what are the pros and cons. Barlow
I have often wondered if it would be worth the trouble to use .308 palma brass for my .260. The heavier web/case head and SR primer interest me. I think there may be some work involved on the necking/turning side. I would not mind finding someone to split a 100 with just to see. Hope more folks reply.
I use this excellent brass in my 243, if you neck turn slightly into the shoulder/neck junction you shouldn't have a donut issue.
Steve Bair
I use this excellent brass in my 243, if you neck turn slightly into the shoulder/neck junction you shouldn't have a donut issue.
Steve Bair