• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

220 Russian

If the 220 Russian case is used to make such accurate rounds as the PPCs abd BRs, why dosen't anyone load it as is?
 
Lou Murdica shoots a 220 Russian with turned necks. I saw him win a BR match with his 22 over some very tough competition. Lou says the 220 Russian will shoot "every bit as accurately as the 6PPC, and may be slightly better in the wind". Lou says the only disadvantage is that the cases do stretch, so you must trim the brass regularly.
 
It seems to me that the various .22 caliber cartridges that have been built on the .220 Russian case are attempts to get to capacities that result in a full case,at peak accuracy) with suitable powders that are, or have been available. Since T,a surplus powder) is no longer available, and we are pretty much in the 133 age, larger capacity variants have emerged.,relative to the .125 short .22 PPC commonly referred to as the Waldog)

Mike Ratigan is a fan of the .100 short,.22PPC). Ron Hoehn has been shooting a .70 short lately, and a friend has one that Ron built for him that seems to like 130,We will see if that continues as the weather heats up.)

When discussing this subject with Bell Mellor, he told me that some time ago he had switched from a Waldog to a straight .22PPC with a 15" twist that the results were as good, without the hassle of pushing the shoulder back for the shorter case. I believe that he is currently sticking with the 6PPC in competition. He also mentioned that he got the tip form Lee Six.

Another fine shooter and excellent gunsmith, Stu Harvey, has a .22x.220 Russian with a 40 degree shoulder that he likes.

Although I am certainly attracted to the easier gun handling that a .22 would give, as long as there is a Sporter class, I will probably stick with the 6PPc to keep things simple,and less expensive). If I change anything at all, it will probably be to go to a frozen scope.
 
Although I am certainly attracted to the easier gun handling that a .22 would give, as long as there is a Sporter class, I will probably stick with the 6PPc to keep things simple,and less expensive). If I change anything at all, it will probably be to go to a frozen scope.
Have things changed? There is a sporter class but you can’t shoot .22 in it
 
Have things changed? There is a sporter class but you can’t shoot .22 in it
A few years ago, the caliber restriction was removed from the Sporter class. Before that you could not shoot .22 caliber in Sporter. As it stands, the only disadvantage to .22s is bullet hole visibility at 200 yards in high mirage conditions.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,288
Messages
2,215,907
Members
79,519
Latest member
DW79
Back
Top