True enough but you’re aware that the question at hand is the 20-223 AI, right?The problem you will encounter is magazine length.
The 223 AI is ideal for heavy bullets. Heavy bullets will perform best if seated long so the base of the bearing surface is forward of the neck to shoulder donut.
To do that requires significant free bore of at least 0.190". That will result in rounds with an overall length close to 2.650"
If you want to feed a round that long you will not find an over the counter mag to do it, but you can modify them as depicted in this video.
Both 223 AccurateMag and steel 223 MDT mags can be modified fairly easily and with nothing more than a drill press and a small end mill. If you have access to a milling machine, more power to ya.
nope... sorry.. missed the 20, not sure about the dimensions of 20 cal bullets.True enough but you’re aware that the question at hand is the 20-223 AI, right?
If you end up with feeding issues, a little massaging of the feed lips should clear up any issues.I'm thinking about building one on a 700 action for prairie dogs. Will it feed as a repeater?
Have you tried a center feed follower from wyatts Keith? Wonder if that would work.I have 4 of the 223 AI's on 700 Repeaters, and NONE of them will feed from the magazine. My situation with 223 AI's feeding from magazines is normal, not the excpetion.
Normally, feed rails need to be modified to feed the AI on Rem 700's.
I have not had trouble with the 22/250 AI's and 243 AI's feeding from 700's.
B23's solution to detachable mags works with AIC mags I have been told, and his brand as well...there is your solution. I am not a fan of detachable mags as I loose them, leave them, forget them, etc.
I’m curious as well. I would think the 204 ruger would be fasterCurious what velocity a 20-223AI would get with 39 to 50gr bullets
Curious what velocity a 20-223AI would get with 39 to 50gr bullets
I’m curious as well. I would think the 204 ruger would be faster