I shoot A-Tips in a number of calibers including (mainly) 7mm. If you are used to jumping bullets in a certain gun in order to shoot small, you may need to double or triple (or more) that jump. If you touch or are close to the lands, trying to avoid the donut or powder compression, you will probably never be happy with the results.
I don’t think any powder choice will produce good groups until the jump is very significant. Once you reach that depth, erring on the side of a deeper seating, if in doubt, does not seem to hurt group size in my experience, and peak pressure goes down. We are predisposed to avoid seating into or past the junction, but that accuracy reservation is overstated. (I try to alter brass as little as possible for smooth bolt close, though, so my brass flow to the donut may be less severe than others. IDK, we all basically handle only our own brass).
.284 is a big ask. You need to get that bullet moving as fast as a 180 in your .284, with a slower burning powder, to see any of the wind bucking gain you are looking for. When I got them shooting in a saum, I put down the early .284 experiments. But now I’m revisiting that combo for midrange, myself, because I’m so stocked up to do it with a .284, slogging through this drought. In practice, either Hornady is optimistic or hand-tipped Berger assumptions are pessimistic on BC, but the true “drift overlap” is a bigger velocity “swath” that we might fall into, than expected.
However, they do like to be pushed hard, meaning that at the velocity where they begin to shoot very accurately, for me, group size does not fall off a cliff by adding somewhat more velocity to that level, in order see markedly less drift than with other bullets. Going too slow for A-Tips to group tight, whether to extend brass or barrel life, is something I have seen come to frustrate others. This is generically true of any bullet heavier than the alternative, though.