• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

1000 Yard accuracy for a 308 shooting 155gr

Hello everyone.

My assumption is that a .308 Target Rifle that shoots 1/4 minute accuracy at 300 Yards with a 155gr match projectile and a Muzzle Velocity of 2950fps will not be a 1/4 minute gun at 1000 Yards.

The factors that come into play that I can think of are the reduced bullet stability as the rotation slows down, and that with a MV of 2950 it will be going trans-sonic at terminal velocity (Mach 1.138 according to JBL).

Questions:
-Are there any other considerations that should be included?
-In peoples experiences how accurate would a ¼ minute Target Rifle at 300 Yards then be at 1000 Yards?
-What could be done to improve 1000 Yard accuracy given that the only things we can really change is barrel specs and loads?



Many thanks in advance
Jason
 
I shoot my 308 at 1000 yards with 155's all day long. Shooting at about 2954 for muzzle velocity and they are super sonic at that distance. No problem hitting a 10 inch x-ring either. It's called Palma shooting and internationally you aren't allowed to shoot a bullet bigger than 156 grains.
 
+1.......Reading the wind is everything.

A guy shooting a one minute rifle who can read the wind will probably beat a guy shooting a 1/4 minute rifle who cannot read the wind.
 
Thanks guys but I am only really looking at gun related dispersion. I'm taking wind out of the equation here. Not that it is not important it is hugely important but this is a question about the reason groups get relatively bigger at 1000 Yards with the 308, 155 grainers at 2950fps. What I have noticed is that even top shooters have more relative vertical dispersion at 1000 yards than even 900 with this set up.

-Has anyone else noticed this?
-What are the non human and non conditional factors (Load, barrel, bullet, MV, TV ect) that may be causing this? (Another thing I just thought of is bullet meplat consistency which becomes more relevant at below mach 1.2)
-How did they help the _rifle_ shoot smaller relative groups at 1000 Yards (308 155gr)


Cheers
Jason
 
The amount the bullet spin slows down is negligible, flight time is about a second and a half, so you will not lose any appreciable stability.
 
Donkey,

What you're talking about here is referred to as an "error budget" in predicting long range accuracy standards. No, they aren't linear, and it's a mistake to assume a 1/4 MOA rifle at 100 yards will remain a 1/4 MOA shooter at 1K. I think Bob McCoy covered this in his book, but my copy isn't handy here in the office at the moment.
 
Donkey.
My 7mms will hold .25 MOA of vertical for 5 to 10 shoot strings shot in the middle of the day under "normal" conditions and better than that in perfect conditions when the POA doesn't look like it's on a trampoline. Under the similar conditions, those 5 to 10 shot strings would open up to something more like .5 MOA of vertical at 1000 yards and open more with a 20 shot string. I often shoot next to some very good F-T/R shooters that get similar results with the Berger 185 BT. Given the very good BCs of some of the new Palma bullets, I would expect something similar if they were shot with those kinds of rifles.

After you've tried everything else that improves ES/SD, position, barrel tune, etc, you should consider trimming meplats and pointing bullets. I am sold on pointing 6mm and 7mm bullets. However, I haven't tried pointing 30 cal bullets but I'm sure it will save you a few points lost to vertical every day if everything else is working right.
 
Thanks Tony that's great.

It is very interesting that this does happen across the board at the long ranges. Do you think it is actually something about the rifle or could it actually just be the vertical in the wind and sight picture variation? That wouldn't explain why things open up so much from 900 - 1000 though.

What about retuning the barrel so that I can run a faster MV on the same harmonic node and aim for 3050fps rather than 2950fps. This would keep the 1000Y TV above Mach 1.2. However I worry that another 100 fps on a 155 may cause more copper fouling which might be bad for long shot strings. Sound plausible?

Is there some thing else that happens at long ranges that I am missing here?


Many thanks
Jason
 
I believe that there may be a number of factors involved and I think that pressure may be one of them. With my Shehane, I can see a harmonic node at 3000 just like at 2800 and 2900 fps but the ES/SD and vertical dispersion are poor even though the middle of the group shoows the same behavior around the node as it does at lower velocities. Most of my best loads shoot under what I believe, based on QuickLoad, is under 60,000 psi but some cases will stand a lot more. I believe that the whole combustion process becomes much less consistent at those higher pressures. I am not saying that someone could design a powder or primer or find a load that would work at those pressures, but I believe that most of the components available to us are designed for use at lower pressures. And to support that point, I have done some testing with a 7mmBooBoo which shoots the 180 grain bullets just fine at 3100 fps but again, I believe that the pressures in that big case (8X68 RWS necked down to 7mm and improved) are below 60000 psi at those velocities.

I also believe that any variation in BC among your bullets shows up bigger as you extend the yardage. I have seen a number of studies and done some measurements of my own and I believe that there is way more variation in BC within a box of bullets than is commonly believed. So I am a big believer in trimming and pointing meplats for long range.
 
Thanks Tony.

Those are some very interesting points you raise. If what you suggest about the pressure is true then it would follow that the only way to get consistent higher velocities is with a longer barrel. Do you agree? I see you seem to be saying that the main reason for group widening at very long ranges is projectile related. That is my hunch as well. Do you think that the BC variation in projectiles at longer ranges is because of the velocity delta over the course of the shot or that the front of the projectile becomes more important as it slows down or both?

With regards to pressure do you think it could be related more to barrel distortion than case primer limitations? If so a bull barrel might be more accurate at those high pressure nodes. I'm guessing you are running a heavy barrel on your 7mm so may be not unless it is the meat around the chamber that is important rather than down the barrel.

I idea of a pressure limited system sure is a good advertisement for progressive burn powders.

Thoughts anyone?
 
Donkey said:
Thanks Tony.

Those are some very interesting points you raise. If what you suggest about the pressure is true then it would follow that the only way to get consistent higher velocities is with a longer barrel. Do you agree? I see you seem to be saying that the main reason for group widening at very long ranges is projectile related. That is my hunch as well. Do you think that the BC variation in projectiles at longer ranges is because of the velocity delta over the course of the shot or that the front of the projectile becomes more important as it slows down or both?

With regards to pressure do you think it could be related more to barrel distortion than case primer limitations? If so a bull barrel might be more accurate at those high pressure nodes. I'm guessing you are running a heavy barrel on your 7mm so may be not unless it is the meat around the chamber that is important rather than down the barrel.

I idea of a pressure limited system sure is a good advertisement for progressive burn powders.

Thoughts anyone?

I think you have raise a number of interesting questions with regard to pressure. I was refering to the process of combustion within the case. I believe this process proceeds differently at pressures that are both higher or lower than the range of pressures at which it is normally used in the cartridges it was designed for.

I do use heavy barrels on my rifles, most straight 1.250 diameter and 30 or 31 inches long. Accuracy has been pretty insensitive to heat. The last 5 shots typically ahve about the same vertical as the first 5 in a string of 20 in the cartridges I have used, but I have heard about scores falling apart at the end of a string with some of the big magnums and I have observed it once my self when I was scoring another shooter. This person was clean through 15 at 1000 in perfect conditions then proceed to drop 8 points in the last 5 shots. I am still trying to understand what actually cause the accuracy to go away but I am reasonably sure that temperature is involved somehow. And I have seen 22 inch 308 sporter barrels start to change POI after just 3-4 rounds.

But you raise some interesting questions about the strength of the actual components such as barrels, actions, etc. I have had some interesting results with one of my rifles, a Rem 700 SA converted to single shot with a nice laminated walnut prone stock that I have adapted for F-Class. I bought it used from a friend with a 31 inch Krieger Heavy Palma barrel chambered in 6mmBR. This combination could be tuned to deliver vertical accuracy that a benchrest shooter would envy but it drifted a lot in the wind so I had it made up as a switch-barrel with another 31 inch Kreiger, this time a 284 Shehane and a straight 1.25 inch cylinder barrel. This thing shot vertical comparable to the 6mmBR but drifted a bunch less in the wind that the BR did. That and another just like it, except with a Nesika action, are what I shoot most of the time.

Then I put a heavy Kreiger 28inch 7mmRSAUM barrel on it and started to see what could be the effects you are thinking about. This combo is a hammer up to a little over 2900 fps with the 180s them starts to fall apart when the velocity gets up to the next node at around 3000 fps even though this is not a maximum load for that case and my chamber. I have wondered whether that big 0.532 diameter case head and the higher operating pressures of the RSAUM does exert too much pressure on the action compared to either the Shehane or the 6mmBR both of which have a .0473 inch 308 boltface and operate with several thousand psi less pressure. I'll know soon enough because I have a 7mmRSAUM on a 1.550 inch round BAT M coming soon, and if that won't stand a lot of pressure I don't know what will.

I do like long barrels because I have been able to tune them without any difficulty and the shorter barrels I have tried needed just as much tuning so why not operate at lower pressures with the longer barrel. This would probably not be true with something like a straight 1.500 diameter barrel in a barrel block. My gunsmith has something like that on a heavy BR gun and he says it isn't particularly load sensitive but it also weighs over 100 pounds.

The variation in BC I was refering to is due to lack of uniformity in the physical dimensions of the bullets. It is not unusual to find ES in overall length of as much as 0.040 inches in a single box of 100 bullets but ES of 0.020 inches has been quite common in my experience and I have measured many thousands of them. Sorting into groups the same length can improve vertical dispersion. Trimmed to the same length then pointed improves it more.

But you raise interesting questions about how BC might vary as the bullet travels down range and looses velocity. Clearly, BC is a function of velocity although the curve is not a straight line. But it does change more in the zone between the speed of sound and about 1.5 times the speed of sound than it does above those speeds. This zone seems to be particularly relevant to your original question because the 155 gr 308 bullets do drop into that region as they near 1000 yards. Byran Litz recently talked about stability in the transonic region in a post on the Long Range forum. You might find that interesting reading.
 
Thank you Tony.

I very much appreciate you well considered and thoughtful reply. The Litz article was what got me thinking about this. I think he mentions Mach 1.2 as a the magic number. Also I started using a Wilson bullet seater die and noticed that my Lapua Sceanar projectiles then had a huge (4-5 thou) variation in seating depth due to the contact point of the seater stem being a lot further down the nose than my old bullet seater which just pressures around the meplat. Scenars obviously have a lot of nose shape variation. They also responded very well to batching and pointing at 1000 Yards.

I wonder about copper fouling having an influence on SD / ES at the higher velocity node. I heard of one 7mm shooter that was pushing his velocities consistently having his group open up after 7 shots. A bore scope reviled severe copper fouling and a clean retuned the accuracy for another 7 shots.


Kind Regards
Jason
 
Funny how these things happen. I was just on the phone with my gunsmith about something else but we did talk about groups falling apart at the end of a string. He has seen it happen even with the heaviest BR guns with some of the big magnums. The example he gave was a 30/404 which makes me cringe just thinking about it. he said that the guy shooting it had to make due with very few sighters, otherwise he couldn't get through a 10 shot record string. Severe fouling in the throat was found. The big issues are where are the limits and what can be done to minimize the problem. Lots of fun!!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,831
Messages
2,185,117
Members
78,541
Latest member
LBanister
Back
Top