What's stupid is that lil tab that inadvertently gets pushed up so the damn tray gets stuck.Ah heck, I hate to get the reputation of a complainer around here. But I don't mind mentioning stupid when I come across it. jd
Annoying!!
What's stupid is that lil tab that inadvertently gets pushed up so the damn tray gets stuck.Ah heck, I hate to get the reputation of a complainer around here. But I don't mind mentioning stupid when I come across it. jd
No big deal, sometimes venting helps calms the spirit.Ah heck, I hate to get the reputation of a complainer around here. But I don't mind mentioning stupid when I come across it. jd
cabin fever is tuffI'll take all the "stupid" boxes of Federal 205M primers you don't want.
Have we really gotten to the place where we are complaining about the manufacturer's packaging of reloading components?![]()
I have severe groundhog fever and it gets worse at the winter wears on! The only known cure is getting out in the hay fields once the weather permits.cabin fever is tuff
Is that true? I know the ownership is the same. I hope the manufacturing is separate. That's too many eggs in one basket.But but but.....
They make CCI in the same house
I started walking down the stairs one time and I dropped a box of primers and it hit my foot perfectly so it could tumble and bounce off the other steps at a high rate of speed and slam into the wall at the bottom. I was glad they were Fed LPM. lolI'll take all the "stupid" boxes of Federal 205M primers you don't want.
Have we really gotten to the place where we are complaining about the manufacturer's packaging of reloading components?![]()
This is the answer. I, too, remember the incident. I was shooting PPC at the time and we couldn't Federal SP primers for over a year.You may note that not all brands have that design. I asked Federal about it many years ago. It seems that a forklift driver forked a palate of primers and set them off. After that the feds mandated a design with more separation.
N0 guessing, the incident happened on the east coast, I think Delaware or Massachusetts but not too sure.There is a lot of guessing and speculation here but not much factual reporting. Boyd actually talked to a Federal employee but I do not think the answer he got was the real cause of the original problem which maybe predated the employees experience with the company. Mass detonation of a pallet of primers by a forklift would have been a significant explosive event.
The failure of the original Federal primer packaging to meet government shipping requirements for explosives goes back a long way to the 1980s(?) and was reported in the gun magazines such as "Handloader" at the time. That failure is what led to the redesign of the Federal primer package to a package which could pass the government shipping test for an explosive.
Primers are an explosive and require careful handling and should remain in the original packaging until used. Once they are removed for reloading, they should be handled with safe procedures that respect their explosive potential. There have been some significant events reported when improper primer handling caused explosions. We do not hear much about this safety hazard today, but it may be worth educating new handloaders to the hazards and the proper storing and handling of primers.
My plan was to call CCI in Livingston, last I spoke with them concerning Federal difference between 205M, and 205M AR the fella on the other end answered CCI Federal. When I stated I had a primer question, he replied "your not 1 of those guys that weight primers are you?"There is a lot of guessing and speculation here but not much factual reporting. Boyd actually talked to a Federal employee but I do not think the answer he got was the real cause of the original problem which maybe predated the employees experience with the company. Mass detonation of a pallet of primers by a forklift would have been a significant explosive event.
The failure of the original Federal primer packaging to meet government shipping requirements for explosives goes back a long way to the 1980s(?) and was reported in the gun magazines such as "Handloader" at the time. That failure is what led to the redesign of the Federal primer package to a package which could pass the government shipping test for an explosive.
Primers are an explosive and require careful handling and should remain in the original packaging until used. Once they are removed for reloading, they should be handled with safe procedures that respect their explosive potential. There have been some significant events reported when improper primer handling caused explosions. We do not hear much about this safety hazard today, but it may be worth educating new handloaders to the hazards and the proper storing and handling of primers.
I tend to think along the same lines as you do, only in my 30/378 Weatherby the only primer I used that gave me good ignition was the Fed 215 and in my PPC the Fed 205 just seems to work good with most loads.I tend to push away from Fed primers when working up a load too. The box, the softness, and actual performance in most cases make me reach for the CCI first. However, sometimes just have to bite the bullet and try them in certain loads.