Bobby Pins were much better. They had a higher BC......LOLA projectile if you got a rubber band
Bobby Pins were much better. They had a higher BC......LOLA projectile if you got a rubber band
Ouch. I remember getting a few of those in the back of the head in schoolBobby Pins were much better.
Wasn't meOuch. I remember getting a few of those in the back of the head in school
You'll probably be waiting another 24 yrs.Still on my 1999 Chrony, Missed the whole Lab thing.
Can wait till price goes down on this New Toy in Town.
At 77 do I even need one ?You'll probably be waiting another 24 yrs.If Garmin does like they've done with their GPS's, we'll be seeing a few firmware and software updates over the next couple years before any new product or reduction in price comes about. I wouldn't hold my breath.
![]()
I'm 81 and I don't need one either, buttttttt!!At 77 do I even need one ?
Dropped out of the Equipment Race already .
It's a fantastically complex and hideously expensive tool that is specifically used to scratch the inside of a brass cartridge to see whether case head separation is imminent.What's a paper clip?
My Graham's use zip ties, not clips. Too heavy I 'spose.I thought they were for attaching tails to windflags.
~10 years of technology advancement helps explain why the Garmin can be smaller. It doesn't explain why Labradar hasn't advanced other than to release a second useless app.You do have to ask yourself what drove Labradar to have such a large form factor when Garmin used such a smaller one. There must be a reason for it. Rarely does an engineering company build a small thing and then decide to put it into a very large (and costlier) box.
Smaller box and more capable, measuring up to 5000fps. Probably technology advancements as mentioned. Still does not explain LabRadar’s failure to upgrade.You do have to ask yourself what drove Labradar to have such a large form factor when Garmin used such a smaller one. There must be a reason for it. Rarely does an engineering company build a small thing and then decide to put it into a very large (and costlier) box.
Well, at age 76 I find the timing of this Garmin product just right as it's what I've been waiting for to dump my MagnetoSpeed for something more convenient. My MagnetoSpeed has worked great, but it is a bit of a hassle changing from one gun to the next at the range (certainly better than the old light sensor style chronos). Having been waiting for something more convenient that's as reliable and accurate, this Garmin meets that objective. Though I do wish it wasn't so tied to a smartphone and had a micro memory card. But, I'll adaptI know two guys that had them, my buddies son who is an engineer, got rid of his the quickest.
Both decided the chrony or the magnetospeed were way less hassle and accurate to a fault. Once initial speed is confirmed, we have found its all we need once our setup is entered to be spot on with the software we use to get us out to 600 yards. Which is all we need.
But simplicity at my age trumps everything!
exactly how does that make it more convenient, this the exact pain in the backside that makes it inconvenient and time consuming. The magneto speed wins that challenge hands down with a matter of seconds to setup,Well, at age 76 I find the timing of this Garmin product just right as it's what I've been waiting for to dump my MagnetoSpeed for something more convenient. My MagnetoSpeed has worked great, but it is a bit of a hassle changing from one gun to the next at the range (certainly better than the old light sensor style chronos). Having been waiting for something more convenient that's as reliable and accurate, this Garmin meets that objective. Though I do wish it wasn't so tied to a smartphone and had a micro memory card. But, I'll adapt.