With respect, I disagree about the clearances. I know a couple of short range group record holders, and additionally I would refer you to the series of videos on Youtube by Jack Neary. All say that for best results they want more than .002 clearance, up to .003 and that the larger clearances show up as better accuracy at 200 yards. On the end clearance, I have never seen or heard of anyone improving performance by running it that tight, a lot of theorizing, but no actual test results. In one of his videos Jack, who has been on the USA World Benchrest Championship team, said that for a PPC chamber with a maximum case length of 1.515 he trims to 1.490.It's not a 'carbon ring', but sooting.
Optimal would be zero.
For this you need ~1thou neck clearance, ~5thou end clearance or less, lower/normal neck tension, snappy pressure peak. It's a loop that feeds on itself in that the quicker the seal, the less gas/pressure gets around the neck to slow sealing, -for quicker sealing. This helps with ES, and mitigation of actual carbon ring formation in the chamber neck.
I do not know of any competitive shooter that views elimination of neck sooting as a goal. All of their goals relate to what happens at the target. Generally in short range group, many people consider that one sign of a well tuned load is a thin soot line on the neck that takes the shape of a rather coarse sine wave. Here is a picture that Jackie Schmidt posted on the subject.Boyd, I wasn't suggesting ~1thou clearance.
I was explaining that needed for zero neck sooting -as a starting point.
But to relate Jack Nearyisms to the subject at hand, what amount of neck sooting is he suggesting?
Well I thought if you use too small a bushing and sized the neck down too much, regardless of the neck thickness, it would be sloppy in the chamber and all powder/soot to flow back around the neck area, causing the soot.Bushing size has nothing to do with fit in the neck of the chamber. That is determined by neck thickness. Once the bullet is seated, the diameter of the neck is always bullet diameter plus twice the neck thickness. Changing the bushing size just changes the interference fit of the bullet in the ID of the neck, which is expanded to bullet diameter by the bullet when it is seated.
You still have to put a bullet back into it, so the bullet diameter plus 2*wall thickness is what goes into the chamber.Well I thought if you use too small a bushing and sized the neck down too much, regardless of the neck thickness, it would be sloppy in the chamber and all powder/soot to flow back around the neck area, causing the soot.
Seems like I have been using neck bushings all wrong and it matters not what size they are then, as long as they are close and you neck turn the thickness down. Smile.
Bushing size is a tuning factor. It does matter, just not for loaded neck diameter. It changes bullet seating force, and pull.Well I thought if you use too small a bushing and sized the neck down too much, regardless of the neck thickness, it would be sloppy in the chamber and all powder/soot to flow back around the neck area, causing the soot.
Seems like I have been using neck bushings all wrong and it matters not what size they are then, as long as they are close and you neck turn the thickness down. Smile.