Ideally you still need the hardness testing to design the algorithm which is used to back off from this point.
How far to back off I would guess was determined experimentally via hardness testing since I doubt there's any governing equations to calculate it directly.
Once a sacrificial case is inserted and "Start” is pressed, AZTEC "Analyse” mode applies a continuous and precise amount of power to the targeted zone of the case until the exact instant that a datum point is reached. In general terms, the longer it takes to reach the datum, the greater the mass of brass in the targeted zone. The capture is extremely accurate and reliable. A patent is pending. By referencing the datum point, AZTEC calculates the correct annealing setting. The calculation, or algorithm, varies from cartridge to cartridge. Extensive laboratory micro-Vickers hardness testing has determined these algorithms.
The Temilaq 750 which is green needs to turn to another shade. This is very hard to tell if it is in flame as it will likely turn black instead first. At the point when the Templaq changes colour just below the shoulder the case is annealed. However taking it just 0.1-0.2 seconds further without it taking on any colour to the case is where I am aiming for.
Their annealer already sets the brass back to the same hardness each time.
Not all hardness testers are created equal, especially for testing something like cartridge brass.Not so much according to someone I know that has a hardness tester. He says the hardness goes all over the place. Does anyone else have readings form a hardness tester that show otherwise?
Not so much according to someone I know that has a hardness tester. He says the hardness goes all over the place. Does anyone else have readings form a hardness tester that show otherwise?
unless it’s a calibrated and certified HV tester, which I doubt, his tests are null and void unfortunately.Not so much according to someone I know that has a hardness tester. He says the hardness goes all over the place. Does anyone else have readings form a hardness tester that show otherwise?
I did some tests to have a look at the current draw Vs time / heat into the case. What i found was that the current gradually increased during the heating process. Then for a very brief period it increased more than the previous linear ramp. Then it took a quick decrease. The last two phases which would be the critical data points for the Aztec happened very quickly.
Will annealing give you smoother more consistent seating? Yes. Will that translate to better groups? Not always
Does anyone know who came up with 750F as the ideal annealing temp with a torch?
As my annealer logs an displays the data while annealing, i tried a 300 win mag case to melting point.
this is the result:View attachment 1120748
X axis -> 1/10 sec
red -> drawn current
blue -> coil temperature
orange -> voltage
A clear maximum at melting point.
Does anyone know who came up with 750F as the ideal annealing temp with a torch?