The attached spreadsheet tool will help you estimate the wind speed at some known distance downrange by using a range finder, your scope field of view data, and the time that it takes for something to pass across your reticle. In the case of something unexpected blowing across your field of view, time the event first, and worry about what the range to the object was after that. Mr. obvious alert — this won’t work if you move the rifle while timing the object. Also note that the object doesn’t have to pass perpendicular to the viewing direction, but if you use the average range while the object passes, you will be calculating the wind speed perpendicular to the viewing direction, and that’s all we care about most of the time anyway.
There is also an option to estimate the wind at your target range based on dispersion of a dust cloud that is generated at impact. In that case, for a strong wind the dust may be blown mainly to one side or it may spread out to both sides before being blown clear. The tool gives you a low speed estimate based on the dust being spread out in both directions and also a high speed estimate for the case with the dust cloud spreading in one direction only. The real answer is probably somewhere between.
My apologies to anyone that may have published something similar. I didn't use your work, but the idea is so simple that I would not be surprised if it has been done. At least the price is good. I hope that some of you will check my math and if there’s an error, let’s fix it. Good shooting.
There is also an option to estimate the wind at your target range based on dispersion of a dust cloud that is generated at impact. In that case, for a strong wind the dust may be blown mainly to one side or it may spread out to both sides before being blown clear. The tool gives you a low speed estimate based on the dust being spread out in both directions and also a high speed estimate for the case with the dust cloud spreading in one direction only. The real answer is probably somewhere between.
My apologies to anyone that may have published something similar. I didn't use your work, but the idea is so simple that I would not be surprised if it has been done. At least the price is good. I hope that some of you will check my math and if there’s an error, let’s fix it. Good shooting.