SOLO is a sub-$1000 e-target made by Silver Mountain Targets (my company).
XTC shooting is a hard one - both for shooters, and for e-target designers.
The only open-sensor e-target system I know of that can outperform
SOLO in XTC applications is SMT's $3800 "G2-8-mic" system. Several shooters here have direct personal experience firing XTC on the twenty lanes of G2-8 SMT targets installed at the Port Malabar Rifle and Pistol club during the 2018 Orange Blossom Regional. It (the SMT e-target system performance) wasn't perfect by any means, but it was a real-world, many-day, many-lane XTC match fired on e-targets, with problems kept down to an arguably livable level. Our sub-$1000
SOLO is actually _nearly_ as good as our almost-$4000 G2-8 system when it comes to two characteristics vital to running an XTC match on e-targets: accuracy, and minimizing shot loss rate. The key reason behind this is our SMT sensor design.
How good is
SOLO? And should you consider it for yourself or your club? For the first time ever publicly, I am prepared to make a couple of claims here, which I hope people will think about and I hope people will subject to independent testing and validation and scrutiny.
My claims are these. Of all the sub-$1000 open-sensor e-targets on the market:
- none outperforms SOLO's accuracy and shot loss rate
- as far as shot loss rate, SOLO starts to outperform as soon as there are three targets in use on the range
- as more targets (beyond three) are added, SOLO's shot loss rate advantage keeps growing and growing
(Fine print: just to be clear, these claims are made in the context of US XTC shooting at 200-300-600 yards, with targets spaced on 7.5-8' centers, for both slowfire and rapid fire)
Let's put some numbers to it. An e-target system with sensors not designed to SMT standards could have a shot loss rate
FOUR TIMES as high as
SOLO if 10 targets are in use, or 6x as high if 15 target are in use, and 8x as high if 20x are in use. Basically, the more targets you add, the more lopsided
SOLO's advantage becomes. The technical reasons would require another thread to discuss, but this is the reason we pour our heart and soul into sensor design.
Or maybe a different way to explain the
SOLO shot loss advantage. If your club is operating fifteen lanes of e-targets and conducting a 200Y or 300Y rapid fire match, then over time and on average:
- a system of 15 lanes of SOLO can be expected to lose one shot per relay (of 15 shooters firing 10 shots RF each). So on average ONE alibi or refire is needed per relay, which is the fault of the e-target system
- a 15-lane system using sensors not up to SMT's standards could be expected to lose up to six shots per relay - so an average of SIX alibis or refires are needed per relay, which are the fault of the e-target system
So there are my claims; they are testable, and can be shown to be wrong if they are wrong. All that is needed is that a test is conducted correctly (which means, have enough lanes of simultaneous firers - at a bare minimum three but ideally ten or even more), and with enough shots to be statistically meaningful (at least 1000 rounds in total). If somebody wants to start a thread on "how to stress-test an e-target system" I'd be happy to contribute. It can be done with as little as one single e-target system, but there is no getting around the need for 1000-ish rounds of ammo and 3-10+ shooters.
I am prepared to lay these claims on the line here because I am confident they will be borne out by anybody anywhere testing our gear and comparing it to anything else on the market.
- Daniel